What it means
The bulletins, known as ARBs, were published by a committee of the American Institute of Accountants, the body that later became the AICPA (the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). Over two decades they tackled problems from inventory pricing to depreciation, pension costs and the treatment of business combinations.
The sheer breadth of subjects shows how little agreed doctrine existed before the committee began its work. The timing was not accidental.
After the 1929 stock market crash and the creation of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) in the 1930s, there was public pressure for credible, uniform company accounts. The profession preferred to write its own rules rather than have government write them, and the committee was its answer.
The bulletins had a structural weakness: they were not binding. Companies could ignore unwelcome guidance, and critics said the committee reacted to problems one at a time instead of building a coherent framework.
The committee was also staffed by part-time volunteers, mostly practising partners from accounting firms, which kept guidance close to real problems but limited the research behind it. ARB No.
43, issued in 1953, restated and consolidated the earlier bulletins into a single reference that became the era's most durable document. In 1959 the committee was replaced by the Accounting Principles Board, whose opinions carried more authority, and in 1973 the independent Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) took over.
The lineage matters because pieces of the ARB era never fully disappeared. Some early guidance flowed through successor bodies into today's codified US GAAP, so the bulletins are a real ancestor of rules accountants still apply.
Other countries building their own standard setters also studied the committee's output and its lessons about authority and independence. For students of business, the ARBs are a lesson in institution building.
Standards work only when authority, research and enforcement line up, and each successor body fixed one of the committee's defects. They are best read as history, not as current authority.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
ARB No. 43 consolidated the earlier bulletins in 1953 and remained a reference point long after the committee that wrote it had been dissolved. A practitioner in the 1960s could open one volume instead of hunting through dozens of separate pronouncements.
Example
An accounting lecturer shows how early guidance on inventory pricing in the ARB era left a mark on rules that still appear in modern US GAAP. Students see that a rule on writing stock down to a lower value has a pedigree of many decades.
Example
A researcher at a university library reads the original bulletins in a digital archive of professional publications to see how the profession reasoned before the FASB existed. The plain language of the drafting is often a surprise to readers used to modern, heavily qualified standards.
Case study
Seen in the real world.
This case study is fictional and illustrative. Dr Alvarez, an invented accounting lecturer at a university in Manila, wants her students to understand why standards carry authority. She sets an exercise: trace how a mid-twentieth-century rule on writing down inventory travelled forward from an Accounting Research Bulletin, through the Accounting Principles Board era, into the FASB codification her class uses today.
The students are startled that wording from before their grandparents' careers still shapes a current rule. One group presents the chain as a family tree on a single slide. The exercise changes how they read standards: not as timeless commandments but as living documents with ancestors, compromises and corrections built in.
In her course feedback that year, one student writes that the history made the modern rulebook feel less like a wall and more like a conversation. Dr Alvarez keeps the family tree slide as the first page of her next course.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Citing ARBs as current authority; they were superseded decades ago and survive only where later standards absorbed their content.
- Assuming the bulletins were binding law; their voluntary nature is exactly why successor bodies were created.
- Overlooking the context; the bulletins were a response to crisis-era demands for trustworthy corporate accounts.
Questions
People also ask.
What replaced the Accounting Research Bulletins?
The Accounting Principles Board took over in 1959 and issued opinions until 1973, when the independent FASB was created. The FASB's codification is now the main home of US GAAP.
How many bulletins were issued?
Fifty-one, between 1939 and 1959, with ARB No. 43 restating and consolidating the earlier work in 1953. The full series is preserved in university and professional archives for researchers.
Why do the ARBs still matter?
Some of their substance flowed into today's standards, and their lack of enforcement taught the profession that standard setting needs real authority and independence. Every later standard setter was designed with that lesson in mind.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%Related