Back to Glossary

Entry · Legal

Adjudication

Adjudication is the formal process of examining a claim, dispute or application against a set of rules and issuing a binding or semi-binding decision. In insurance and healthcare it means processing a submitted claim to work out what will actually be paid.

In construction and commercial disputes it is a fast-track alternative to court that produces a decision within weeks rather than years.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

The word carries two related meanings in business, and both come down to a third party applying rules to a set of facts and reaching a decision. Claims adjudication decides how much of a submitted bill is payable, while dispute adjudication decides who is right in a contractual disagreement.

Claims adjudication is largely mechanical. A submitted claim is matched against eligibility, contracted rates, coverage limits, deductibles and coinsurance, and the system produces an allowed amount, a payer share and a claimant share, with anything rejected flagged with a reason code.

Dispute adjudication works to a strict timetable, most familiarly in construction contracts where a party can refer a payment dispute to an adjudicator who must decide within a set number of days. The decision binds the parties immediately, which keeps cash moving on a project, though either side can later challenge it in arbitration or court.

The commercial reason both versions matter is cash flow and predictability. Slow or inconsistent adjudication ties up working capital, generates rework and disputes, and makes revenue recognition difficult because nobody knows what proportion of billed amounts will ultimately be collected.

The nuance worth knowing is the difference between a denial and a rejection in claims work. A rejection usually means the submission failed a formatting or data check and can be corrected and resubmitted, while a denial is a decision on the merits that requires an appeal.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A dental practice submits 900 claims a month and finds 12% come back rejected for missing tooth numbers or mismatched patient identifiers. Fixing the intake form at reception cuts rejections to 3% and pulls average days to payment down by nine days.

2

Example

A subcontractor on an office refurbishment is owed $180,000 for variations the main contractor disputes. It refers the matter to adjudication under the construction contract, receives a decision in 28 days awarding $142,000, and is paid while the wider account remains unsettled.

3

Example

A commercial insurer adjudicates a business interruption claim by applying the policy's indemnity period, deductible and gross profit definition to the claimed loss. The claimed $620,000 is adjudicated down to $470,000, and the difference is explained line by line in the settlement letter.

Formula

Calculation

Allowed amount = Billed amount - Contractual disallowance Claimant responsibility = Remaining deductible + (Coinsurance rate x Amount after deductible) Payer share = Allowed amount - Claimant responsibility A physiotherapy clinic bills $4,200 for a course of treatment. The patient's insurer has a contracted rate that allows $3,000 for that course, the patient has $500 of deductible still to meet, and the plan then pays 80% with the patient covering 20% coinsurance. Contractual disallowance = $4,200 - $3,000 = $1,200, which the clinic writes off and cannot bill to the patient. Amount after deductible = $3,000 - $500 = $2,500 Coinsurance = $2,500 x 0.20 = $500 Claimant responsibility = $500 + $500 = $1,000 Payer share = $3,000 - $1,000 = $2,000 So against a $4,200 bill the clinic collects $2,000 from the insurer and $1,000 from the patient, a total of $3,000, and absorbs the $1,200 contractual difference. A clinic that budgets on billed amounts rather than adjudicated amounts will overstate its expected cash by 40%.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

This is a fictional, illustrative example. Beckerman Diagnostics ran three imaging clinics and consistently reported strong billed revenue while struggling to pay suppliers on time. The finance team's own dashboard tracked gross charges, so nobody had a clear picture of what adjudication was actually returning.

An analysis of six months of remittances showed that adjudicated payments averaged 64% of billed charges, with roughly 9% of claims denied outright and a further 7% rejected for data errors and never resubmitted. The largest single cause of denial was missing prior authorisation on one high-value scan type, which accounted for about $240,000 of unpaid work across the period.

Beckerman introduced a pre-submission checklist, a weekly denial review meeting and a rule that no rejected claim could sit uncorrected for more than five working days. In the illustrative outcome, collections rose from 64% to 79% of billed charges within two quarters, without the clinics performing a single additional scan.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Reporting and budgeting on billed amounts rather than expected adjudicated amounts, which systematically overstates cash and makes forecasts unreliable.
  • Treating a rejection as a final decision, when a rejection is usually a data or formatting failure that can be corrected and resubmitted quickly.
  • Assuming an adjudicator's decision in a construction dispute is the end of the matter, when it binds the parties on an interim basis and can still be challenged in arbitration or court.

Questions

People also ask.

How long does construction adjudication normally take?

Timetables vary by jurisdiction and contract, but the whole point of the process is speed, and decisions are commonly required within around a month of the referral.

What is the difference between adjudication and arbitration?

Adjudication is fast, interim and usually cheaper, while arbitration is a fuller process producing a final award that is much harder to reopen.

How can a business reduce adjudication losses?

Fix data quality at the point of submission, track denial reasons by category rather than in aggregate, and set a hard internal deadline for resubmitting anything that comes back correctable.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.