Back to Glossary

Entry · Legal

Affiliated Person

An affiliated person is someone who controls a company, is controlled by it, or sits under the same control as it, which in practice usually means senior officers, directors and large shareholders. The label matters because affiliated people face extra rules on trading shares, disclosing deals and approving transactions with the business.

It is a legal and regulatory status, not a comment on anyone's conduct.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

Regulators worry about people who can influence a company from the inside, because they may see information before the market does or approve deals that quietly favour themselves. Labelling such people as affiliated is the mechanism for applying tighter rules to that smaller group.

Control is the heart of the definition, and it is judged on substance rather than job titles. A shareholder holding 10% or more of the voting stock is commonly presumed to be affiliated, and directors, the chief executive and other policy-making officers almost always qualify.

The consequences fall into three buckets. Affiliated people must report their shareholdings and trades, they usually can only sell shares under restrictions on volume and timing, and any contract between them and the company counts as a related party transaction that has to be disclosed and independently approved.

The status is also used well beyond securities law. Lenders limit payments to affiliated people in loan covenants, auditors ask for a list of them so related party balances can be identified, and insurers and regulated firms often need approval before dealing with an affiliate at all.

One nuance trips people up regularly: affiliation is a spectrum of influence rather than a single bright line. Someone with 8% of the shares and two board seats may well be treated as affiliated, while a passive 12% index fund holder with no board presence may argue it is not, so the facts matter more than the percentage alone.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A logistics company's chief financial officer wants to sell shares after a strong results announcement. As an affiliated person she can only trade inside an open window, must pre-clear the sale with the general counsel, and has to file a public disclosure within days of trading.

2

Example

A family-owned packaging business leases its main warehouse from a company owned by the founder's brother. The auditors identify the brother as an affiliated person, so the lease is disclosed as a related party transaction and the audit committee checks that the rent matches market rates.

3

Example

A fintech lender's credit agreement caps management fees paid to affiliated people at $250,000 a year. When the majority shareholder proposes a $400,000 advisory fee to a firm he owns, the finance team has to seek a waiver from the lender before paying it.

Formula

Calculation

There is no profit formula, but the common ownership test is arithmetic. Voting stake = shares held with voting rights / total voting shares outstanding Presumption of affiliation applies at a voting stake of 10% or more. Worked example. Harbourline Systems has 10,000,000 voting shares in issue. An early backer holds 1,200,000 of them and also nominates one of the seven directors. Voting stake = 1,200,000 / 10,000,000 = 0.12, or 12% Because 12% is above the 10% presumption and the backer also has a board seat, the company treats the backer as an affiliated person. That has an immediate practical effect: when the backer wants to sell, resale limits typically cap a quarterly sale at 1% of shares outstanding, which is 10,000,000 x 0.01 = 100,000 shares. Selling the full 1,200,000 stake through that route would take 1,200,000 / 100,000 = 12 quarters, so the backer negotiates a registered secondary offering instead.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

Copperfield Analytics is an illustrative, invented data business preparing for its first external audit. The finance team submitted a related party list containing only the four executive directors, on the view that shareholders were investors rather than insiders.

The auditors pushed back. One venture fund held 14% of the voting shares, appointed a director and held a veto over the annual budget, which made it an affiliated person under the control test regardless of how the company had labelled it. Three transactions with portfolio companies of that fund, worth $1,800,000 in total, therefore needed disclosure in the notes to the accounts.

Nothing improper had happened in this fictional example, and all three contracts were priced sensibly. The lesson the board took away was procedural: the company built a standing affiliated person register, reviewed quarterly, so that disclosure obligations were identified before a deal was signed rather than after the year end.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Believing only employees can be affiliated people. Outside shareholders, controlling investors and companies under common ownership are frequently caught by the definition.
  • Treating the 10% shareholding level as a hard rule in both directions. It is a presumption, and board influence or contractual veto rights can create affiliation at a much lower stake.
  • Assuming a related party transaction is forbidden. Most are perfectly legitimate, and the requirement is to disclose them and approve them independently rather than to avoid them.

Questions

People also ask.

Is affiliated person the same as an insider?

The two overlap heavily, but insider rules focus on access to non-public information while affiliation focuses on control, so a mid-level employee can be an insider without being an affiliated person.

How does a company decide who is on the list?

It reviews the share register, the board roster, senior management contracts and any agreements granting veto or appointment rights, then updates the list at least once a year.

Do affiliated people ever lose the status?

Yes, once someone resigns from the board and reduces the shareholding below the threshold, affiliation usually lapses, although resale restrictions can continue for a cooling-off period.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.