What it means
Avoidable costs matter most when you are deciding whether to keep or cut an activity, and only the costs that would actually go away should count in that decision. Typical avoidable costs include materials, sales commissions, the wages of staff who work only on that activity and rent on a site you can hand back.
Unavoidable costs stay even if the activity stops, and head office salaries, long-term leases you cannot exit and shared systems usually fall into this group. A common trap is dropping a product that looks unprofitable after shared overheads are allocated, because if those overheads stay the business can end up worse off.
An avoidable-cost estimate should name the alternative and the date: a fixed expense can be avoidable if it belongs solely to the activity and can be ended, while a variable expense may still be committed through an uncancellable order. Ask which contract, employee assignment or supplier payment will actually change.
Whether a cost is avoidable often depends on time, since a lease may be unavoidable this year but avoidable at renewal. An exit may cause severance, cleanup, return freight or penalties before savings begin, so map the cash flows by month rather than calling full-year savings immediate.
Some resources move rather than disappear. Staff may keep the same pay while working on another product, so wages do not fall even though their time has an alternative use, and a freed machine may generate new contribution after setup, which should be counted only when demand and capacity are plausible.
Sunk costs should not justify continuing a weak activity, because spending already incurred cannot be recovered by wishing it back. Yet equipment resale proceeds are future cash and can matter, so separate past spending, future savings and future revenue.
For managers, the question is simple: if we stop doing this tomorrow, which costs actually go away? Build a keep-versus-stop table with revenue lost, costs saved, exit costs and the best realistic alternative use, and confirm with operations which purchase orders and leases can end.
Review connected sales, customer expectations and staff effects alongside the numbers.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A bakery stops making a slow-selling cake. It saves the ingredients and the part-time baker's hours, but not the oven or the shop rent. The owner compares those savings with the sales lost before deciding whether the cake earns its place on the menu.
Example
A company closes a small branch and hands back the lease, avoiding rent, utilities and local staff costs. It also pays a one-off fee to end the lease early, which it counts against the savings. The head office costs allocated to the branch stay exactly where they were.
Example
A firm cancels a monthly software subscription used by only one team, saving the full fee. The finance manager first checks that the contract can be ended on a month's notice. She also confirms that no other team relies on the data held in the system.
Formula
Calculation
Financial effect of stopping = avoidable costs saved - revenue lost - exit costs + value of the best alternative use of freed resources.
Worked example. A product line brings in $400,000 of revenue a year. Its avoidable costs (materials, direct staff and commissions) are $320,000, and it is charged $120,000 of allocated overheads that would stay if the line stopped. The reported result after overheads is $400,000 - $320,000 - $120,000 = -$40,000, so the line looks loss-making.
The effect of stopping is different: $320,000 saved - $400,000 lost = -$80,000. Dropping the line would cut profit by $80,000, because the $120,000 of overheads would simply be spread over the remaining products. If stopping also cost $15,000 in exit costs, the first-year effect would be -$95,000, and only if the freed space could earn $50,000 of new contribution would the loss shrink to -$45,000.Case study
Seen in the real world.
This illustrative and entirely fictional example follows Palm Crafts, an invented furniture maker whose monthly report showed its outdoor range losing money after overheads. The range brought in $500,000 of revenue, had $410,000 of avoidable costs and was charged $130,000 of allocated overhead, so it showed a loss of $500,000 - $410,000 - $130,000 = -$40,000. The board proposed closing it. The finance manager split the costs into avoidable and unavoidable.
Most of the overhead charged to the range, including the factory lease and management salaries, would stay, so closing the range would have cut profit by $410,000 - $500,000 = -$90,000 a year. Palm Crafts kept the range and raised prices on its lowest-margin items instead. The team also checked when the lease could end and whether the production space had another buyer. It set a review date rather than assuming every accounting allocation was cash that could be saved immediately.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating allocated overhead as avoidable without checking whether the payment stops.
- Ignoring exit costs and the date on which a contract can actually end.
- Counting only savings while overlooking lost sales or alternative use of capacity.
Questions
People also ask.
What is the difference between avoidable and unavoidable costs?
Avoidable costs disappear if you stop an activity. Unavoidable costs continue regardless.
Are fixed costs ever avoidable?
Yes. A fixed cost tied to one activity, such as a dedicated site lease, can be avoided if that activity stops.
When should I use avoidable costs?
When deciding whether to drop a product, close a location, outsource work or end a contract.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%