What it means
Financial measures record what has already happened. Profit this quarter is the result of decisions about customers, products, processes and people made months or years ago.
An organisation that manages only on financial results is driving by looking in the mirror, and it will cut the very investments (training, service, innovation, maintenance) that produce next year's numbers because they cost money this year. The balanced scorecard adds leading indicators from the other three perspectives so that the causes are managed alongside the effects.
The four perspectives form a chain of cause and effect. Investment in people, systems and culture (learning and growth) improves the organisation's processes (internal); better processes deliver more value to customers (customer); satisfied customers produce revenue and profit (financial).
A strategy map draws these links explicitly, showing, for example, how a training programme in a call centre reduces handling errors, which raises customer retention, which lifts revenue. The scorecard then attaches a measure and target to each link.
The discipline is in selection. A scorecard with fifty measures is a data dump; a good one has perhaps four to six per perspective, each chosen because it tracks a specific strategic objective, and each with a named owner.
Measures are reviewed regularly, typically monthly for operational measures and quarterly for strategic ones, and the discussion focuses on the links: if customer satisfaction is rising but revenue is not, is the strategy map wrong, or is there a lag? The scorecard cascades.
The corporate scorecard sets the direction; each division, department and, in some organisations, each individual has a scorecard whose measures contribute to the level above. Incentives are often tied to a balanced set of measures rather than to profit alone, which reduces the gaming that a single financial target invites.
Critics note that scorecards can become bureaucratic, that the causal links are often assumed rather than tested, and that the framework says nothing about which strategy to pursue; it is a tool for executing a strategy, not for choosing one.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A hospital's scorecard balances financial measures (cost per case) with clinical quality (infection rates), patient experience (satisfaction) and staff development (training hours), and reviews all four at each board meeting.
Example
A manufacturing plant's scorecard links equipment maintenance training (learning) to overall equipment effectiveness (process) to on-time delivery (customer) to margin (financial).
Example
A charity uses a scorecard with beneficiaries at the top instead of financial results, since money is a means rather than the end.
Think of it
“A balanced scorecard measures success from multiple angles-not just money, but customers, processes, and growth too.
Formula
Calculation
The scorecard is a structure, not a formula, but each measure within it is quantified and many are ratios.
Worked example. A regional bank branch network builds a scorecard for its strategy of growing profitable small business customers.
Financial perspective:
- Revenue from small business customers: target growth 15% a year (current $40 million)
- Cost-to-income ratio: target 55% (current 61%)
- Return on equity: target 13% (current 11%)
Customer perspective:
- Small business customer satisfaction: target 80% rating service good or excellent (current 68%)
- Small business customer retention: target 92% (current 86%)
- Share of small business customers using three or more products: target 45% (current 31%)
Internal process perspective:
- Business loan decision time: target 3 days (current 9 days)
- Account opening errors: target below 2% (current 6%)
- Proactive contact: every business customer contacted by a relationship manager at least quarterly (current 40%)
Learning and growth perspective:
- Relationship managers certified in business lending: target 100% (current 55%)
- Staff engagement score: target 75% (current 64%)
- New customer relationship system fully deployed by year end (current: pilot in 3 of 40 branches)
The strategy map reads: certify staff and deploy the system (learning) so that loan decisions are faster and contact is proactive (process), so that customers are more satisfied, stay longer and buy more products (customer), so that revenue grows and the cost-to-income ratio falls (financial). Each quarter the executive reviews whether the leading measures are moving and, a quarter or two later, whether the lagging ones follow. If loan decision time falls to 3 days and satisfaction does not move, the map is tested.Case study
Seen in the real world.
A logistics company had managed for years on a monthly financial pack and a single bonus metric, operating profit. Profit had grown, but customer complaints were rising, driver turnover had reached 45% a year, and two large contracts had been lost at renewal. The new chief executive introduced a balanced scorecard with twelve measures across the four perspectives, including on-time delivery, damage rates, driver retention and customer satisfaction, and rebalanced management bonuses so that financial measures counted for 40% rather than 100%.
The first year's scorecard showed the links: depots with high driver turnover had worse on-time performance and more damage, and those were the depots losing customers. The company invested in driver pay and training in the worst depots, accepting a short-term hit to profit.
Within two years driver turnover fell to 22%, on-time delivery rose from 91% to 97%, contract renewals rose to 95%, and operating profit was higher than under the old regime. The chief executive's summary was that the old bonus had paid managers to run the depots into the ground slowly.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Loading the scorecard with every available measure. Choose the few that track the strategy and drop the rest.
- Treating the four perspectives as separate lists rather than a chain of cause and effect. The links are the point.
- Never testing the assumed links. If leading measures improve and lagging ones do not, the strategy map needs revising.
Questions
People also ask.
Is the balanced scorecard still relevant?
Yes, though many organisations use it in simplified forms or alongside objectives and key results (OKRs). The principle of balancing financial outcomes with their drivers is widely accepted.
How many measures should a scorecard have?
Typically 12 to 24 in total across the four perspectives, with 4 to 6 per perspective and a named owner for each.
How does the scorecard relate to the budget?
The budget sets financial targets and resource limits; the scorecard adds the non-financial objectives and initiatives that the budget is meant to fund. The two should be built together.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%