What it means
A client asks a contractor to add a new system after work has begun; the added hardware has a price but may also affect design approvals, other trades and the completion date, and change order impact analysis sets out those effects before a decision is made. AIA Contract Documents describes change orders as written adjustments to contract work, price or time, and AACE discusses contract change management in engineering and construction.
Actual notice, authorisation and entitlement rules depend on the signed contract and local law, so the analysis should not silently become approval. Describe the change by stating exactly what is added, removed or modified, including drawings and specifications, and locate the baseline by comparing the proposal with the current approved scope, schedule and budget, since a change may already be included in the contract.
Record the request source, because a client instruction, design revision or site condition can carry different responsibilities, and preserve dates and original wording. Check notice requirements too, as some contracts require prompt written notice before extra time or money can be claimed.
Estimate direct cost by itemising materials, labour, equipment, subcontractor quotes and disposal under contract rules, because a single lump sum hides assumptions. Check credits: removing work may reduce cost, but cancellation fees, restocking and redesign can offset the saving, so show the net effect.
Review contract rates as well, since unit prices, markup and daywork rules may apply under the signed agreement's valuation method. Assess schedule by identifying affected activities, procurement lead times and dependencies, since a change on the critical path can matter more than its labour hours suggest, while a delay to one task may not delay completion if float is genuinely available.
Check design coordination, because a new duct may conflict with electrical routes or structure, and check approvals such as permits, landlord consent, safety review or customer sign-off. Long-lead items may need orders before installation, and quotes can expire, so record validity and price risk.
Consider productivity, since doing work out of sequence can raise access and rework cost, and support any disruption allowance with evidence. A longer project can require extra site overhead such as management, hire or temporary services, which should be tied to actual time impact.
Inspect risk specifically, as safety, testing, warranties and interface responsibility may change, and update cash timing, because a cost increase at completion and an immediate deposit have different funding implications. Separate estimate from approval: a priced proposal is not permission to start work, so track pending, approved and rejected states and record exclusions such as testing, commissioning or permits that are not priced.
Check overlap between changes to avoid double counting delay or labour, preserve contemporaneous records such as photos, site instructions, timesheets and quotes, and report uncertainty where a site condition has not yet been opened up. After approval, update drawings, budget, schedule and procurement instructions, include tests, handover documents and warranty updates, and forecast the cumulative impact so the owner can compare benefit, cost and alternatives before committing.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
Adding a control panel changes materials, installation labour and commissioning tests. The analysis prices each item separately and checks whether the panel needs a long delivery time. The client sees the full cost before agreeing.
Example
Removing a room finish creates a credit but may incur a restocking charge and redesign time. The analysis shows the credit net of those costs. The client learns that the saving is smaller than it first looked.
Example
A small design change delays a long-lead component on the critical path. The direct cost is low, but the completion date moves. The analysis records the schedule effect and the evidence for it.
Formula
Calculation
Net price impact = added eligible cost - valid omitted-work credit + applicable contract adjustments.
Worked example: adding a control panel costs $20,000 (materials $12,000, installation labour $6,000 and commissioning tests $2,000), while omitting a room finish gives a credit of $5,000. The net price impact is $20,000 - $5,000 = $15,000 before agreed time and overhead effects. If the contract allows a 10% markup on the net amount, the markup is $1,500 and the proposal totals $16,500.Case study
Seen in the real world.
This entirely fictional example follows Cedar Build. A client requested a larger air-handling unit. The contractor priced hardware and redesign, mapped its delivery lead time to the current schedule and waited for written authorization before placing the order. The case does not assume every change automatically extends the contract date.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating a verbal request as a fully approved change without checking the contract.
- Pricing materials while omitting testing and schedule effects.
- Adding several overlapping delays together without checking their interaction.
Questions
People also ask.
What baseline is used?
The current approved scope, price and schedule.
Does an estimate authorize work?
No. Follow the contract change-approval process.
Why check schedule?
A change can affect critical activities even when its direct cost is small.
From the founder's library

Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%Related
