What it means
Companies create share classes to separate two things that ordinarily travel together: the economic claim on profits and the right to vote on who runs the business. Splitting them lets founders raise substantial outside money while keeping control of strategy, which is common in family businesses, media groups and technology listings.
Because the labels are not standardised, you cannot assume anything from the letter alone. In many modern listings Class A is the ordinary share sold to the public with one vote each, while Class B is a super-voting share held by founders, but plenty of older companies use exactly the opposite arrangement.
Whatever the arrangement, the practical questions are the same three. How many votes does each share carry, does either class rank ahead on dividends or on a wind up, and can one class convert into the other, typically when a founder sells or dies.
Dual class structures are contentious for good reason. Supporters argue they protect long term thinking from quarterly pressure, while critics point out that a holder with a small slice of the economics can control every decision, and index providers have restricted eligibility for some dual class companies as a result.
For an outside investor the discipline is simple: work out the split between economic ownership and voting control, and price the difference. Non-voting or low-voting shares in the same company often trade at a discount to their higher-voting equivalent, and that discount widens when governance concerns rise.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A family bakery group lists on the market and sells 30% of its equity as Class A shares with one vote each. The founding family retains Class B shares with ten votes each, so it raises $40,000,000 of growth capital while keeping a clear majority of the votes.
Example
An index fund manager reviews a dual class technology company and finds the public Class A shares trade about 3% below the closely held class. The discount reflects the fact that Class A holders cannot influence board appointments even collectively.
Example
A private company issues Class A shares to outside investors carrying a preference on dividends, so the first $500,000 of distributions each year goes to Class A before the founders' class receives anything.
Formula
Calculation
Voting power of a class = (Shares in that class x Votes per share) / Total votes across all classes x 100
Meridian Media has 8,000,000 Class A shares carrying one vote each and 2,000,000 Class B shares carrying ten votes each.
Class A votes = 8,000,000 x 1 = 8,000,000.
Class B votes = 2,000,000 x 10 = 20,000,000.
Total votes = 8,000,000 + 20,000,000 = 28,000,000.
Class A voting power = 8,000,000 / 28,000,000 x 100 = 28.6%.
Class B voting power = 20,000,000 / 28,000,000 x 100 = 71.4%.
On economics the picture reverses. Total shares are 8,000,000 + 2,000,000 = 10,000,000, so Class A holders own 8,000,000 / 10,000,000 = 80% of the company and receive 80% of any dividend, while controlling under 29% of the votes.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Kestrel Foods Group is an invented, illustrative company used here to show what dual class structures do in a real decision. Two siblings built a chilled ready meals business over eighteen years and needed $25,000,000 to fund a second production site, which would have meant selling roughly 40% of a single class of ordinary shares and losing effective control of recipe standards and sourcing.
Instead they restructured into two classes. Investors received Class A shares with one vote each and full economic rights, while the siblings converted their existing holding into Class B shares carrying ten votes each, with an automatic conversion to Class A if either sold outside the family.
In this fictional example the trade off was explicit on both sides. Investors accepted limited influence in exchange for a lower entry price and a seat on an advisory board, and the siblings accepted that if they ever sold down, their extra votes would evaporate rather than being sold on to a stranger.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Assuming Class A always means the better or senior class. The letters are naming conventions with no fixed meaning, and the only reliable source is the company's own constitution or prospectus.
- Confusing voting rights with economic rights. A class can hold most of the votes while owning a small fraction of the profits, which is precisely the point of a dual class structure.
- Ignoring conversion clauses. A super-voting class that converts automatically on sale or death behaves very differently over time from one with no such trigger.
Questions
People also ask.
Do Class A shares always get dividends first?
Only if the constitution says so. Dividend priority is a separate feature from voting power and the two are set independently.
Why would anyone buy the lower-voting class?
Because it usually costs less, offers the same claim on profits, and most small shareholders have no realistic influence on outcomes even when they do hold votes.
Can a company collapse its share classes?
Yes, through a recapitalisation approved by shareholders, and companies sometimes do this to qualify for index inclusion or to satisfy investor pressure on governance.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%