Back to Glossary

Entry · Ratios

Combined Ratio

The combined ratio shows whether an insurance company makes money on the policies it writes, before counting any investment income. It adds the claims paid to the costs of running the business and divides that total by the premiums earned.

Below 100% means the underwriting itself is profitable; above 100% means the insurer is relying on investment returns to make up the difference.

What it means

An insurer has two engines. The first is underwriting, which is taking in premiums and paying out claims and expenses, and the second is investing the premiums it holds before claims fall due.

The combined ratio measures only the first engine, which is why it is the headline number in every insurance results announcement. It is built from two components.

The loss ratio is claims incurred divided by premiums earned, and the expense ratio is the costs of acquiring and administering the business divided by premiums. Adding them gives the combined ratio, and the shorthand reading is simple: it is the cost of every dollar of premium.

Non-insurance readers find the below-100% rule counterintuitive at first, but it works like a cost percentage rather than a margin. A combined ratio of 93% means the insurer spends 93 cents in claims and costs for each dollar of premium, keeping 7 cents as underwriting profit.

A ratio of 104% means it loses 4 cents per dollar underwritten and needs investment income to finish in the black. The ratio drives real business behaviour.

When it climbs, insurers raise prices, tighten policy wordings, refuse marginal risks or exit whole lines of business, and that decision cycle is what produces the hard and soft markets that commercial buyers experience as sudden swings in premium. Anyone negotiating business insurance benefits from knowing which way their insurer's ratio is moving.

Two nuances matter when comparing insurers. Claims figures include estimates for losses that have happened but not yet been reported, so a ratio can be restated later as those estimates settle, and some insurers quote the ratio net of reinsurance while others quote it gross.

Comparing across companies without checking the basis is a reliable way to reach the wrong conclusion.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A specialist marine insurer reports a combined ratio of 88% after a year with no major cargo losses. Its board approves a return of capital to shareholders because underwriting alone generated a comfortable profit. The chief underwriter warns that one severe storm season could reverse the picture.

2

Example

A motor insurer posts a combined ratio of 107% for the second year running as repair costs rise faster than premiums. It raises renewal prices by an average of 12% and withdraws from insuring drivers under 25. Policyholders experience this as a hard market, but it is the ratio driving the decisions.

3

Example

A manufacturing group's insurance broker explains that its main insurer's combined ratio has jumped from 94% to 103%. The broker advises starting renewal discussions three months early and preparing a strong risk management presentation. The group secures a 6% increase rather than the 20% quoted to less prepared buyers.

Think of it

Combined ratio shows if an insurer makes or loses money on insurance-under 100% is profitable.

Formula

Calculation

Loss ratio = Claims incurred / Premiums earned Expense ratio = Underwriting expenses / Premiums earned Combined ratio = Loss ratio + Expense ratio A mid-sized commercial insurer earns $50,000,000 of premium in a year. It incurs $32,500,000 of claims and $14,000,000 of underwriting expenses, covering commissions, salaries and administration. Loss ratio = $32,500,000 / $50,000,000 = 65%. Expense ratio = $14,000,000 / $50,000,000 = 28%. Combined ratio = 65% + 28% = 93%. Checking it directly: total costs of $32,500,000 + $14,000,000 = $46,500,000, and $46,500,000 / $50,000,000 = 93%. The underwriting profit is $50,000,000 - $46,500,000 = $3,500,000, which is 7% of premium, and any investment return on the premium float sits on top of that.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

This case is fictional and provided for illustration only. Kestrel Mutual, an invented regional insurer of small commercial properties, ran at a combined ratio of 97% for several years and treated that as acceptable because investment income lifted overall profit comfortably. When interest rates fell sharply, that investment cushion thinned and the board finally looked hard at the underwriting number.

Analysis showed the loss ratio was a healthy 62% but the expense ratio had crept to 35%, driven by high broker commissions on small policies and a manual renewal process. The problem was not the risks being insured; it was the cost of putting them on the books.

Kestrel moved renewals for policies under $5,000 of premium to an online process and renegotiated its commission structure, taking around four points out of the expense ratio over two years. The combined ratio settled near 93%, and the illustrative lesson is that around a third of this number has nothing to do with claims at all.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Reading the combined ratio as a profit margin, so a ratio of 95% is misread as a 95% margin rather than a 5% underwriting profit.
  • Assuming a ratio above 100% means the insurer is losing money overall, when investment income on the premium float can still deliver a profit.
  • Comparing two insurers' ratios without checking whether both are stated net of reinsurance and on the same accounting basis.

Questions

People also ask.

What is a good combined ratio?

Consistently below 100% is the goal, and the low 90s over a full cycle is considered strong for most commercial lines.

Does it include investment income?

No, and that is the point; it deliberately isolates underwriting performance so investors can see whether the core business works.

Why does my premium rise when insurers report bad ratios?

Because a ratio above 100% means the line is unprofitable, and insurers respond by raising prices, tightening terms or leaving the market, which reduces the supply of cover.

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · September 4, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.