Back to Glossary

Comps

Comps is shorthand for comparables: a set of similar properties, businesses or operating units used as a benchmark for value or performance. In a home appraisal, the appraiser compares the subject property with similar sales and adjusts for material differences.

In corporate valuation, analysts compare financial multiples across peer firms.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

A benchmark helps answer a practical question: what is this asset worth, or how much has this operation changed? The benchmark is only as strong as the similarity between the items.

In residential appraisal, an appraiser selects recently sold properties resembling the subject in location and physical features, and FHFA describes selection, adjustments and reconciliation of adjusted sale prices as the sales-comparison approach. A nearby sale is not automatically comparable, because different square footage, renovation, lot, sale date or transaction conditions may require an adjustment or make a property unsuitable.

If a comparable has a feature the subject lacks, its sale price may be adjusted downward for comparison, and the adjustment estimates the feature's market contribution, not necessarily its construction cost. Several sales can produce a range rather than a single obvious value, so the appraiser weighs quality and comparability before reconciling a value conclusion.

An asking price is not the same as an observed completed sale, and listing evidence may provide context but treating it as identical to a closed transaction can distort the estimate. A business analyst uses a different type of comp: public companies with similar activities, growth and risk, whose ratios such as enterprise value to EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) or price to earnings can be compared with a target firm.

Capital structure matters, because enterprise-value multiples compare the value of operations while equity-value multiples use a share price or market capitalisation, and mixing the numerator and denominator produces a meaningless number. A company's high multiple may reflect growth or lower risk rather than a universally better price, so peer selection and adjustments for margins, geography, accounting and debt deserve inspection.

The retail use of comps has a different purpose: comparable-store sales aim to track changes at stores that meet a chain's inclusion rules, removing some noise from openings and closures. A chain can report rising total revenue while comp sales fall if new stores drive expansion, and then the existing-store trend tells a different story from the consolidated sales line.

Comp-store definitions can differ across firms, as one chain may require a store to be open twelve months while another may exclude renovations or include online fulfilment differently. Comparing growth percentages requires a consistent base period, since a holiday calendar shift, currency change or unusually strong prior period can influence the interpretation.

The same adjective comparable does not prove comparability, because a condo sale, a listed retailer and an existing shop are each a comp for different questions, with different inputs and caveats. Always name the target, the peer set, the selection rule and the adjustment method, which makes the benchmark reproducible and lets a reviewer challenge weak assumptions.

Good comp work explains both inclusion and exclusion, noting why a seemingly similar property or company was rejected, not only why the chosen observations look persuasive. Comps are a decision aid, not a guaranteed sale price or investment return, because market conditions can change between observed transactions and the future decision.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

An appraiser compares an apartment with three recent local apartment sales and adjusts for floor area and parking differences. One comparable has a garage space the subject lacks, so its sale price is adjusted downward. The adjusted prices are then reconciled into a single supported range.

2

Example

An analyst compares enterprise value to EBITDA among five similar companies before valuing a private target. Two peers are set aside because they carry much more debt and operate in different regions. The analyst records the reason for each exclusion in the valuation file.

3

Example

A retailer's total revenue grows after opening stores, while sales at established comparable stores decline. The board reads the comp-store line first, because it shows how the existing estate is trading. Management then investigates pricing and footfall at the weaker locations.

Formula

Calculation

Illustrative comp-store growth = (current-period sales of eligible stores - prior comparable-period sales for those same stores) / prior comparable-period sales. If eligible stores earned $95 million versus $100 million, the comparable-store change is -5%, even if new stores increased total company revenue. For a valuation comp, the multiple is enterprise value / EBITDA. If a peer has an enterprise value of $240 million and EBITDA of $30 million, its multiple is $240 million / $30 million = 8. Applying that multiple to a target with $5 million of EBITDA suggests an enterprise value of 8 x $5 million = $40 million, before adjusting for differences in growth, risk and debt.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

Fictional example: A manager wants to value a small chain of home-supply stores. Three listed peers have enterprise-value-to-EBITDA ratios of 6, 8 and 13. The highest-multiple company has much faster online growth and lower debt.

The manager does not simply average all three and claim an exact sale price. They examine the target's profits, lease obligations and growth, then show a valuation range with reasons for weighting the more similar peers. Separately, the manager checks comparable-store sales because strong revenue from new locations may hide weaker established stores.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Using a nearby property or famous company as a comp without checking material differences.
  • Confusing retail comparable-store growth with total sales or with business valuation multiples.
  • Presenting an adjusted benchmark as a guaranteed transaction price without a range or limitations.

Questions

People also ask.

Are asking prices valid real estate comps?

They may provide context, but completed comparable sales usually give stronger evidence of a transacted price.

What are retail comps?

Sales changes for stores meeting the retailer's eligibility rules across comparable periods.

Why adjust property comps?

Differences in location, size, condition or timing can affect price and need explicit judgment.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.