What it means
Approving a loan is a snapshot; a credit review is the film that follows it. The lender re-reads the latest accounts, tests covenant compliance, checks the value of any security and forms a fresh view of whether the borrower can still service the debt from cash generated by the business.
Reviews matter because credit problems are cheap to fix early and very expensive to fix late. A lender that spots interest cover falling a year in advance can renegotiate terms or take extra security, while one that discovers the problem at the point of default is negotiating over the wreckage.
From the borrower's side, a review is an information request with real consequences attached. Management accounts, an updated forecast, an ageing of receivables and an explanation of any variance against plan are the usual requests, and a slow or vague response is itself treated as a warning sign.
Most lenders score reviews on a weighted scorecard so that different analysts reach comparable conclusions about similar businesses. Factors such as leverage, interest cover, liquidity and management quality each carry a weight, and the weighted total maps to an internal grade that drives pricing and provisioning.
A review does not always end in a changed rating. Common outcomes include leaving the facility untouched, adding an information covenant, reducing an undrawn limit, requesting additional security, or moving the borrower to a watch list for more frequent monitoring.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A bank runs its annual review of a haulage business and finds that although profit is flat, the average age of the fleet has risen sharply and capital spending has been deferred. It keeps the rating unchanged but adds a covenant requiring minimum annual investment in vehicles.
Example
A specialist lender reviews a hotel loan after a soft trading season and finds the debt service coverage ratio has fallen from 1.6 times to 1.15 times against a covenant of 1.10 times. Rather than wait, it agrees a temporary interest only period in exchange for a cash sweep once trading recovers.
Example
An invoice finance provider carries out a mid year review of a recruitment agency and notices that one end customer now accounts for 48% of the receivables funded. It reduces the concentration limit and asks the agency to diversify before the next review.
Formula
Calculation
Weighted risk score = Sum of (factor score x factor weight)
A bank scores each factor from 1, the weakest, to 10, the strongest, using these weights: leverage 40%, interest cover 30%, liquidity 20%, and management and market position 10%.
At this year's review a borrower scores 6 on leverage, 7 on interest cover, 8 on liquidity and 5 on management and market position.
Leverage: 6 x 40% = 2.4
Interest cover: 7 x 30% = 2.1
Liquidity: 8 x 20% = 1.6
Management and market position: 5 x 10% = 0.5
Weighted risk score = 2.4 + 2.1 + 1.6 + 0.5 = 6.6 out of 10, which sits above the bank's threshold of 6.0 for standard annual monitoring.
The following year the borrower funds an acquisition with debt and its leverage score falls to 3, with the other factors unchanged. The weighted score becomes (3 x 40%) + 2.1 + 1.6 + 0.5 = 1.2 + 4.2 = 5.4. That is below the 6.0 threshold, so the facility moves to quarterly review and the margin steps up by 0.50%, costing $200,000 a year on a $40,000,000 drawn balance.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Ravensworth Print Group is a fictional commercial printer used here to illustrate what a credit review actually does. In the illustration the group had borrowed $12,000,000 to buy new presses and had been reviewed each March without incident for four years, holding a comfortable internal grade.
At the fifth review the analyst noticed that revenue was flat but receivables had grown by 40% and inventory by a third, meaning the cash conversion cycle had stretched by roughly six weeks. Profit still looked acceptable, and no covenant had been breached, but the cash to service the loan was increasingly being funded by the overdraft rather than by trading.
The bank moved Ravensworth to quarterly monitoring, capped the overdraft at its current level and asked for a monthly receivables ageing. Six months of visible pressure led the directors to write off a stalled export contract and tighten collections, and the illustrative point is that the review caught a working capital problem a full year before it would have shown up as a missed payment.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating the annual review as a formality and sending information late, which lenders read as a signal that something is being hidden.
- Sending only statutory accounts, when the lender wants management accounts and a forward forecast to judge whether repayment is still comfortable.
- Assuming that meeting every covenant means the review will be clean, since lenders also react to trends that no covenant captures.
Questions
People also ask.
What triggers a review outside the normal cycle?
A covenant breach, a large acquisition, the loss of a major customer, a change of ownership or auditor, or a downgrade elsewhere in the group.
Can a credit review change the interest rate?
Yes, where the facility contains a pricing grid linked to the internal rating or to a financial ratio, the margin moves automatically with the new assessment.
How should a borrower prepare?
Send accurate numbers early, explain variances before being asked, and bring the lender the bad news yourself rather than letting the analyst find it.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%