Back to Glossary

Entry · Accounting

Ebitae

EBITAE is a profit measure that takes a company's earnings and adds back interest, taxes, amortisation (the gradual write-off of intangible assets) and exploration costs. It is a niche cousin of EBITDA, and the final "E" is read differently by different analysts, so it always needs a stated definition.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

EBITAE stands for earnings before interest, taxes, amortisation and exploration. It belongs to the family of "earnings before" measures that try to show how much profit a business generates from its operations, before financing choices, tax bills and certain accounting charges get in the way.

The "E" at the end is the unusual part, and in most uses it refers to exploration expense, which is the money spent searching for new resources such as oil, gas or minerals. The reason anyone bothers with a measure like this is comparability.

Two mining companies might account for exploration spending in different ways, with one writing it off immediately and the other spreading it over several years. Adding the exploration cost back puts both businesses on a similar footing before you compare them.

In practice EBITAE is rarely a headline number. Most listed companies report EBITDA, EBIT or net income, and the more specialised variants appear in industry reports, lender covenants or internal management packs.

If you meet EBITAE in a document, check the footnote or glossary to see exactly what has been added back, because some writers use the final "E" for other items such as exhaustion of natural resources. A second nuance is that this measure leaves depreciation in the cost base, unlike EBITDA.

That means a business with heavy machinery will look less profitable on EBITAE than on EBITDA. Whether that is helpful depends on the question being asked, but it is a reminder that every "earnings before" label hides a choice about what is left in and what is taken out.

Finally, like all adjusted profit measures, EBITAE is not defined by accounting standards. It is a management or analyst measure, so two companies can calculate it differently and still call it the same name.

Treat it as a useful lens rather than an official figure. When you build a presentation around EBITAE, the safest habit is to show the bridge from net income in a small table.

List each add-back on its own line with its dollar amount, and say in plain words why it has been added back. Readers can then challenge any individual line without having to reject the whole measure.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A mining finance team compares two junior gold producers. One expenses its exploration drilling immediately while the other capitalises it, so the team calculates EBITAE for both to remove that difference before ranking them.

2

Example

A bank lending to an oil and gas services firm writes EBITAE into its loan agreement as the profit measure for a leverage test. The definition lists exactly which costs may be added back, so there is no argument later.

3

Example

A software company that buys technology licences reports a large amortisation charge each year. Its analyst builds a simple earnings-before view that adds back amortisation but leaves depreciation of servers and laptops in, to show how heavy the physical cost base is.

Formula

Calculation

EBITAE = Net income + Interest expense + Income tax expense + Amortisation + Exploration expense Worked example for a small mineral exploration business: Net income: $600,000 Interest expense: $100,000 Income tax expense: $200,000 Amortisation: $50,000 Exploration expense: $150,000 EBITAE = $600,000 + $100,000 + $200,000 + $50,000 + $150,000 = $1,100,000 So the business earned $1,100,000 before those five items, even though its net income was only $600,000. To read the result, compare the $1,100,000 with the $600,000 of net income. The $500,000 gap is made up of the five add-backs, and the largest single item is the $200,000 tax charge. If exploration spending doubled to $300,000 next year while everything else stayed the same, EBITAE would rise by $150,000, even though the business would be no more profitable in real terms.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

This is a fictional story. Ridgeway Lithium Partners, an invented exploration company, spent $150,000 last year drilling test sites and wanted to show investors its underlying earnings. The finance director calculated EBITAE at $1,100,000 and set it beside net income of $600,000 in the investor deck.

An investor asked why the figures differed so much. The finance director walked through the bridge line by line, showing that interest, tax, amortisation and exploration spending explained the whole gap. The investor appreciated the clarity and asked that the same bridge appear in every future report so the definition never drifted.

The episode taught the team a lasting lesson about labelling. From then on every slide that quoted EBITAE carried a one-line footnote reading "earnings before interest, taxes, amortisation and exploration", which saved repeated questions and kept new board members from assuming the figure meant something else.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Assuming EBITAE means the same thing everywhere. The final "E" can mean exploration or another item, so always read the definition used by the author.
  • Treating EBITAE as if it were cash flow. It ignores working capital, capital spending and the cash cost of exploration itself.
  • Comparing EBITAE with EBITDA as though they were interchangeable. EBITAE leaves depreciation in, so it will usually be lower for asset-heavy businesses.

Questions

People also ask.

Is EBITAE an official accounting measure?

No. It is a non-standard performance measure, so companies define it themselves and should explain how they calculate it.

Why add back exploration expense?

Exploration spending is uncertain and lumpy, and different companies account for it differently, so adding it back makes comparisons fairer.

Who uses EBITAE?

It appears mostly in resource-sector analysis, specialist lending documents and internal management reports rather than in mainstream public reporting.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.