Back to Glossary

Entry · Insurance

Follow the Settlements

Follow the settlements is a reinsurance-contract principle or clause under which a reinsurer accepts qualifying claims settlements made by the reinsured insurer, subject to the agreement and applicable law. It reduces the need to relitigate every underlying settlement. It does not automatically make the reinsurer liable for risks outside the reinsurance cover or remove all contractual conditions.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

An insurer may transfer part of its exposure to a reinsurer. When the insurer settles a policyholder's claim, the reinsurer then has to decide whether its share is payable, and a follow-the-settlements clause helps define how much it must accept the insurer's settlement decision.

The commercial purpose is efficient claims handling, because without an agreed approach an insurer could reasonably settle a claim yet face a second extensive dispute with its reinsurer about the same underlying issues. The actual wording matters.

Some contracts set conditions concerning good faith, businesslike settlement or the relationship between the settlement and covered risks, and a general phrase in a summary cannot replace the signed agreement. Coverage under the underlying insurance and coverage under the reinsurance are separate questions, so a settlement payable by the insurer does not necessarily fall within the reinsurer's period, limits or insured risks.

The clause is not a device for rewriting those boundaries. The UK House of Lords decision concerning Lexington, Wasa and AGF explains that follow-the-settlements clauses do not bring risks within a reinsurance policy if they otherwise fall outside its proper interpretation, which illustrates an important limit, not a universal answer to every contractual dispute.

Follow the fortunes is a related expression, but terminology and legal effects can vary, so the two phrases should not be assumed interchangeable in all jurisdictions and the governing law and clause language must be examined together. Settlement documentation remains important.

The insurer may need to explain the claim, allocation and basis for the agreed amount, and a poorly documented settlement can make the reinsurer's review more difficult even where the clause is intended to support finality. Notification and claims-control provisions can also matter, since the contract may require prompt notice or participation in decisions, and these provisions should be read alongside the settlement clause rather than ignored as unrelated administration.

For a manager, estimate recoveries using the actual reinsurance agreement and claim facts. A cash-flow forecast should distinguish an underlying payment from a confirmed reinsurance recovery, and expecting reimbursement does not mean the cash will arrive immediately or without review.

The reinsurance share may also be subject to retentions and exhaustion of limits, so a settlement accepted in principle can produce a smaller payment than expected once those terms are applied. Finance should therefore distinguish acceptance of the settlement basis from agreement on the final recoverable amount.

Recovery timing also depends on the reporting and payment procedure, so track submitted amounts, acknowledged amounts and cash received separately, so a legal expectation is not mistaken for a settled receivable.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

An insurer settles a covered property claim after documented negotiation. Its reinsurance contains a qualifying settlement clause. The reinsurer assesses its share under that wording rather than independently reopening every detail of the policyholder dispute.

2

Example

An insurer pays a claim involving damage outside the reinsurance period. A follow-the-settlements clause does not automatically extend the period. The underlying insurer's liability and the reinsurer's cover can differ.

3

Example

A settlement includes several kinds of loss, only some covered by the reinsurance. The insurer records the allocation and supporting reasoning. A single total without explanation can complicate the recovery even if the overall settlement was reasonable.

Formula

Calculation

Recovery = reinsurance share x settlement amount falling within the relevant cover. Worked example. A qualifying $1 million settlement falls within a 40% proportional reinsurance share, giving $400,000 before limits and other terms. If only $700,000 is within the relevant cover, applying 40% gives $280,000. - Submitted to the reinsurer: $280,000. Acknowledged in principle: $280,000. Cash received so far: $140,000. - The open receivable is $280,000 - $140,000 = $140,000, and it is reported as submitted, not as cash. The clause does not decide the coverage amount by itself.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

Fictional case: Harbor Insurance forecasts a large recovery after settling a complex claim. Its legal team checks the reinsurance period and finds that part of the damage predates it. The company revises the forecast and provides an allocation analysis.

It does not treat the settlement clause as permission to bypass the reinsurer's coverage boundaries. Harbor then agrees a simple tracker with finance showing, for each claim, the amount submitted, the amount acknowledged and the cash received. The forecast counts only the acknowledged amounts, and the allocation analysis is attached to each submission.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Assuming every underlying settlement is automatically covered by the reinsurance contract.
  • Using the phrase without reading conditions, governing law and claims-control provisions.
  • Forecasting immediate recovery without checking allocation, documentation and payment status.

Questions

People also ask.

Does it remove coverage limits?

No. The reinsurance scope, period and limits still matter. A settlement clause does not automatically expand them.

Is it identical to follow the fortunes?

Not necessarily. Usage and legal interpretation vary. Review the actual wording and governing law rather than assume equivalence.

Why keep detailed settlement records?

They help establish the claim, allocation and compliance with the agreement. Respecting a settlement decision does not remove every evidential or contractual requirement.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.