What it means
The mechanics are simple in outline. A sender hands cash to a broker, agrees a code word, and the recipient collects the local currency equivalent from a partner broker abroad after quoting that code, with no funds actually crossing the border at the moment of the transfer.
The brokers settle between themselves later, and often not in cash at all. Balances build up in both directions and are netted off over time, or cleared through trade invoices, goods shipments or reciprocal payments, which is why the system needs very little working capital relative to the value it moves.
It matters commercially because it is fast, cheap and reaches places formal banking does not. Remittance corridors serving rural areas, conflict zones and communities without bank accounts are often served far better by these networks than by wire transfer, and the cost advantage over a traditional bank wire can be substantial.
The same features create the compliance problem. Because settlement is informal and records are minimal, the system can be used to move value without the customer identification, transaction monitoring and reporting that regulated payment channels are required to apply.
Regulators have responded in different ways depending on the jurisdiction. Several countries licence and supervise these operators as money service businesses with customer identification and reporting obligations, while others prohibit them outright and prosecute unlicensed operation.
For a business, the practical relevance is usually indirect but real. If your suppliers, contractors or overseas staff are paid through such networks, your own anti-money-laundering controls and banking relationships are affected, and most banks will ask pointed questions about payment routes that avoid the formal system.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A construction contractor in the Gulf sends part of his monthly wages to his family in a rural district with no bank branch within 60 kilometres. He pays a broker near his accommodation on payday, and his mother collects the local currency from a shopkeeper in her village the same evening. The total cost is a fraction of the bank alternative, and the money arrives in hours rather than days.
Example
An aid organisation needs to pay local staff and suppliers in a region where the banking system has collapsed. Its treasury team uses a licensed money service operator running on a hawala-style settlement model, documents every payment against invoices and identification, and reports the arrangement to its own bank in advance. The transparency keeps its banking relationship intact.
Example
A UK-based import business finds its bank freezing incoming payments from an overseas customer who has been settling through an unlicensed broker. The bank's monitoring flags the lack of an identifiable originating institution. The importer insists on formal bank transfers thereafter, absorbing a higher cost to keep its account open.
Formula
Calculation
There is no formula, but the cost comparison that drives the choice is straightforward:
Total cost = Fixed fee + (Amount x Commission %) + (Amount x Foreign exchange spread %)
Sending $5,000 by conventional bank wire: the bank charges a fixed fee of $45, applies no separate commission, and builds a 3.5% margin into the exchange rate, so the exchange cost is $5,000 x 0.035 = $175. Total cost is $45 + $175 = $220, and the recipient receives $4,780 of value.
Sending the same $5,000 through a hawala broker: there is no fixed fee, commission is 1.5%, or $5,000 x 0.015 = $75, and the exchange spread is 1%, or $5,000 x 0.01 = $50. Total cost is $75 + $50 = $125, and the recipient receives $4,875.
That is a cost of 4.4% of the amount sent through the bank against 2.5% through the broker, a saving of $95 on a single $5,000 transfer. For a worker sending money home monthly, the annual difference is over $1,100, which explains the persistence of the system despite regulatory pressure.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Sable Trading Company is a fictional business invented for this illustrative case. It imported textiles and had for years accepted payment from one long-standing overseas customer through an intermediary who deposited cash in local currency, an arrangement the founder regarded as simply how that market worked.
When Sable applied for an expanded overdraft facility, its bank ran an enhanced review and identified that around 18% of receipts had no traceable originating institution. The facility was declined, and the bank gave 90 days notice on the account while it completed further checks, which left the company scrambling for banking cover in the middle of its main buying season.
Sable rebuilt the arrangement rather than defending it. It required the customer to pay through a licensed institution, accepted a slightly higher landed cost, documented the change in a written policy, and shared that policy with the bank. The facility was granted at the second attempt nine months later. The illustrative lesson is that informal value transfer is rarely a problem of legality for the receiving business, and almost always a problem of bankability.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Assuming hawala is inherently illegal, when the position depends entirely on jurisdiction and on whether the operator holds the required licence.
- Treating the low headline fee as the whole cost, since the exchange rate margin is usually the larger component on both sides of any comparison.
- Ignoring what payment routes your counterparties use, because your bank will judge the risk of your account partly on where your money comes from.
Questions
People also ask.
Why does the system still exist when banks are everywhere?
It is faster, cheaper and reaches communities without bank branches or accounts, and it works on trust between brokers who often share a language and a home region.
How do the brokers actually settle with each other?
Balances are netted over time between the two ends, and any remaining imbalance is cleared through trade goods, invoices or reciprocal transfers rather than a single wire payment.
What should a business do if it is offered payment this way?
Establish whether the operator is licensed in both jurisdictions, insist on full documentation of the payer and the invoice being settled, and disclose the arrangement to your own bank before it discovers it during a review.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%Related