What it means
The model begins with the idea that a person's readiness depends on the task at hand. Someone can be highly skilled at preparing a budget and a beginner at presenting it to the board.
Readiness combines competence, meaning skill and knowledge, with commitment, meaning confidence and motivation. Leaders then choose between two kinds of behaviour.
Directive behaviour means telling people what to do and how to do it, while supportive behaviour means listening, encouraging and explaining. Combining high and low levels of each gives four styles, called telling, selling, participating and delegating.
Telling suits someone who is new and eager but unskilled, so the leader gives clear instructions and watches closely. Selling suits someone who has some skill but has lost some confidence, so the leader explains the reasons and encourages.
Participating suits a capable person who lacks confidence, so the leader shares decisions, and delegating suits a capable and motivated person, so the leader hands over responsibility. For finance and business teams, the model offers a practical way to manage people.
A new analyst in the first month needs detailed guidance on the month-end close, while a senior accountant needs room to run reconciliations with only an occasional check. Giving a veteran too much direction feels like micromanagement, and giving a newcomer too little leaves them lost.
Critics note that the model is easy to remember but has limited research support, that judging readiness is subjective and that leaders may fail to move people through the stages as they grow. It is best treated as a conversation tool, not a formula.
Many managers use it as a prompt to ask what each person needs from them for the task in front of them. The model also reminds managers that styles should change over time.
As a newcomer gains skill, the leader should step back gradually, moving from telling to selling, then participating and eventually delegating. Staying in one style too long, whether too controlling or too distant, is a common cause of frustration on both sides.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A new junior accountant joins a firm's finance team. Her manager uses the telling style, giving step-by-step instructions on posting journals and checking each batch before it is approved. As the junior gains confidence over the following months, the manager reduces the checking and starts to explain the reasons behind each step.
Example
A mid-level analyst who has built several forecasts becomes unsure after a mistake in one. His manager uses the selling style, explaining how the error arose, praising the parts that were right and agreeing a clear fix.
Example
A senior financial controller has run the audit process for years and knows every auditor and every working paper by heart. Her chief financial officer delegates the whole process to her and asks only for a brief monthly update. The controller welcomes the trust and uses the freedom to redesign the process, saving her team about two days each month.
Case study
Seen in the real world.
Tidewater Logistics is a fictional company whose finance director, Maya, led a team of eight. She managed everybody the same way, with daily check-ins and detailed reviews, and her two most experienced people grew frustrated while three newcomers still struggled.
After training on the model in this illustrative case, Maya sorted tasks by readiness. She kept close guidance for the newcomers on reconciliations, moved to coaching for two people in the middle, and delegated the quarterly forecast fully to a senior analyst. Staff turnover in the team fell from three leavers a year to one, and month-end close finished a day earlier.
Maya also began holding a short monthly conversation with each person to agree what style they needed for the coming tasks. The conversations took 20 minutes each, and the team said they felt that their manager now understood what they needed from her. Her own director noted the improvement in the quarterly engagement survey.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Labelling a person with one style for everything, when readiness differs from task to task.
- Delegating to someone who is capable but has not been given clear goals, which confuses readiness with freedom from guidance.
- Treating the model as a scientific law, when it is a practical framework with limited empirical backing and should be used with judgement.
Questions
People also ask.
What are the four leadership styles?
They are telling, selling, participating and delegating.
Who created the model?
Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard developed it in the late 1960s, and Blanchard later developed a related version.
How is it different from other leadership theories?
It focuses on adapting to the follower and the task rather than on a single fixed style or on the personality of the leader.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%Related