What it means
Utility represents the satisfaction or preference associated with outcomes, not a cash balance. A risk-averse person is represented by a concave utility function, meaning an additional unit of wealth contributes progressively less utility.
Absolute risk aversion measures how sharply that utility curve bends relative to its slope, and risk tolerance is the reciprocal, so higher tolerance means less aversion under the same local measure. In the HARA family, tolerance can be written as a constant plus a coefficient times wealth.
That simple relation supports analytical solutions while allowing different responses to changing wealth. The family includes important special cases under suitable parameters, as constant absolute risk aversion and constant relative risk aversion fit within the broader framework rather than being unrelated ideas.
An academic paper from the London School of Economics discusses HARA's role in consumption and portfolio-choice models. The usefulness comes from a specified functional structure, not proof that every investor actually behaves that way.
Parameter choices matter, since a model in which tolerance rises with wealth produces different implications from one with constant tolerance, and the relevant domain must keep the function economically meaningful. The framework is not a questionnaire score or a universal investment recommendation.
Applying it requires assumptions about preferences, opportunities, time horizon and the uncertainty of outcomes. Portfolio results derived from HARA can also depend on market assumptions, so a claim about common risky-asset holdings may require additional conditions and should not be presented as the defining property of every HARA model.
Managers may encounter the concept in economic research or quantitative investment reports. They should ask what behaviour is assumed, how parameters were selected and whether the conclusions remain stable under alternatives.
The main practical lesson is that risk preferences can be modelled explicitly, but a tractable utility family's elegance does not replace evidence about the people or decisions it is meant to describe.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
An analyst assumes risk tolerance rises by a fixed amount for each additional unit of wealth. The HARA specification makes that assumption explicit and allows its implications to be tested. The analyst reports the chosen parameters alongside the results so that a reviewer can repeat the work.
Example
A research team compares a constant-tolerance case with a wealth-sensitive case. The different recommended allocations come from preference assumptions as well as market data. The team shows both allocations side by side rather than presenting one as the answer.
Example
An investment committee asks whether a model's results survive another utility specification. Sensitivity analysis shows which conclusions depend on the chosen risk-preference family. The committee records the conclusions that held under every specification.
Formula
Calculation
For a differentiable utility function u, absolute risk aversion is minus the second derivative divided by the first derivative. Absolute risk tolerance is minus the first derivative divided by the second derivative.
In a HARA specification, tolerance can take the form T(W) = a + b x W. If a is 20 and b is 0.10 in consistent wealth units, tolerance at wealth of 100 is 20 + 0.10 x 100 = 30, and at wealth of 200 it is 20 + 0.10 x 200 = 40. The reciprocal aversion measures are about 1 / 30 = 0.0333 and 1 / 40 = 0.025 respectively.
Special cases follow from the parameters. If b is 0, tolerance stays at a constant 20 whatever the wealth, which is constant absolute risk aversion of 1 / 20 = 0.05. If a is 0 and b is 0.5, tolerance is 0.5 x W, so relative risk aversion, wealth divided by tolerance, is constant at 1 / 0.5 = 2. These numbers illustrate the assumed relation; their economic meaning depends on units, parameters and the utility function's valid domain.Case study
Seen in the real world.
The following is an illustrative and fictional case. Fairway Research used a HARA preference model to analyse retirement investment choices. Its first report presented one allocation as the optimal answer. A reviewer asked the team to explain the wealth-tolerance parameters and show results for households with different preferences and spending commitments.
The revised analysis found that some conclusions changed materially when tolerance was less sensitive to wealth. A requirement to fund near-term spending also altered the allocation compared with the unconstrained model. The team presented a range of scenarios and stated the assumptions behind each. It stopped describing the mathematical optimum as a recommendation for every household.
The model remained useful because it organised a difficult choice. Making the preferences and constraints visible prevented a convenient functional form from being confused with observed behaviour or a guaranteed investment outcome. Fairway also added a plain-English note to its report explaining what tolerance means, so non-specialist readers could challenge the assumptions.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating HARA as a direct observation of investor behaviour. It is a model family with chosen parameters.
- Confusing risk tolerance with risk aversion. They are reciprocal local measures under the stated utility framework.
- Applying a portfolio conclusion without its other assumptions. Market structure, constraints and time horizon can affect the result.
Questions
People also ask.
What makes HARA distinctive?
Its absolute risk tolerance is linear in wealth, which provides a flexible structure for utility and choice models.
Does it mean richer people always take more risk?
Not as a universal fact. That depends on the model parameters and decision context, and actual behaviour needs evidence.
Why do analysts use it?
It includes several useful preference forms and can make complex optimisation problems more manageable while keeping risk assumptions explicit.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%