What it means
The process begins with a useful question. A team that asks how to shorten invoice disputes may generate more relevant ideas than one told simply to be innovative without a defined problem.
Good questions leave room for different answers without becoming vague, and they can include a customer need, a practical constraint or an operational result, while avoiding an assumption that a particular solution is already correct. Teams often separate generating possibilities from evaluating them.
Judging every suggestion immediately can suppress alternatives before their potential becomes clear, especially when junior staff are reluctant to challenge a manager. That separation is temporary rather than an exemption from financial discipline, because ideas eventually need examination for cost, feasibility, demand, risk and the evidence supporting the intended benefit.
An idea can be communicated through a sketch, short written description, prototype or process map. Making it visible helps other people identify assumptions and misunderstandings that a spoken slogan may hide.
Stanford's design-thinking tools treat generating ideas as one part of a wider process, where understanding people, testing possibilities and learning from feedback matter alongside the initial brainstorming activity. The aim is not necessarily to produce the largest possible list.
Several materially different options may be more useful than dozens of minor variations on the first suggestion. Ideas from customers, frontline employees and other departments may reveal different parts of the problem, but seniority does not establish which idea is commercially sound, and enthusiasm is not evidence of demand.
A finance participant can help by explaining constraints without turning the meeting into premature budget approval. Cash requirements, capacity and the cost of a small test can guide practical experimentation.
For a non-finance manager, ideation is valuable when it leads to learning and better choices. Record the assumptions, choose proportionate tests and distinguish promising possibilities from decisions that commit people, money or reputation.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
An accounts team proposes several ways to reduce missing purchase-order details. A new form, earlier training and an automated check are distinct ideas that can be tested before a full system change.
Example
A product team sketches alternative service packages for customers with different usage patterns. Customer interviews may reveal that an appealing internal idea does not solve the buyers' actual problem.
Example
A factory team suggests changes to reduce changeover time. It compares a small scheduling test with a major equipment purchase instead of assuming the more expensive proposal is more innovative.
Formula
Calculation
There is no universal ideation formula. A useful experiment can nevertheless compare the expected financial effect with the cost of testing an idea.
Suppose a team believes a revised order form could prevent 50 errors a month, each using 20 minutes of staff time. Potential time saved is 1,000 minutes, or about 16.67 hours a month.
At an illustrative loaded labour cost of $30 an hour, that represents about $500 of capacity a month. It is not automatically a cash saving because staff may remain employed and other work must absorb the released time.
A 1,000-dollar pilot may be reasonable if it tests whether errors actually fall. The calculation supports a test design; it does not prove the original idea or justify unlimited development spending.Case study
Seen in the real world.
The following is an illustrative and fictional case. Meadow Services wanted to reduce repeated customer calls about delivery dates. The manager initially favoured buying a new tracking platform. An ideation meeting with support, dispatch and finance produced other options, including clearer confirmation messages and earlier updates when a shipment changed. The team wrote down what each option assumed.
It then tested revised messages with a small customer group, measuring repeat contacts and asking whether customers understood the promised date. The test reduced some calls but revealed that delays caused by missing stock data remained. Management combined a communication change with a smaller data-cleaning project rather than buying the original platform immediately. Ideation created alternatives and exposed the real constraint. The value came from testing and choosing, not from the number of sticky notes or the confidence of the first proposal.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Confusing a large list of suggestions with evidence that any suggestion will create value.
- Rejecting alternatives too early or allowing the most senior voice to define every answer.
- Moving from an appealing idea to a major commitment without testing its assumptions and costs.
Questions
People also ask.
Is ideation the same as brainstorming?
Brainstorming is one method. Ideation can also use observation, sketches, individual work, prototypes and structured questions.
Should finance be involved before an idea is selected?
Often yes. Finance can explain constraints and help design affordable tests without treating every early suggestion as an approved investment.
How do you know the process was useful?
Look for better-understood problems, meaningful alternatives and evidence from tests. Counting ideas alone does not show business value.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%