Back to Glossary

Entry · Business

Imperfect Competition

Imperfect competition describes any market where individual sellers have some power to set their own price rather than simply accepting whatever the market dictates. It covers almost every real market, from monopolies with a single supplier to crowded sectors where each brand is slightly different from the next.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

Economics textbooks start with perfect competition, a tidy model in which many small firms sell identical products, everybody knows every price and no single seller can shift the market. That model is a useful benchmark, but virtually no real market meets its conditions.

Imperfect competition is the umbrella term for everything else. It includes monopoly, where one firm supplies the market, oligopoly, where a handful of large firms watch each other closely, and monopolistic competition, where many firms sell products that customers see as meaningfully different.

What links these structures is pricing power. Because customers cannot switch instantly to an identical substitute, a firm can raise price somewhat without losing all its sales, which means it faces a downward sloping demand curve rather than a flat one.

That single fact changes how the firm should think about price, volume and investment. For managers this is not an abstraction, it is the whole basis of strategy.

Brands, patents, network effects, switching costs, distribution control and location are all ways of creating or defending the imperfection that lets a firm earn more than a bare return on capital. The measurement most often used is the Lerner Index, the gap between price and marginal cost expressed as a share of price.

It runs from zero under perfect competition to close to one where a seller faces almost no competitive constraint, and competition authorities use similar reasoning when assessing mergers and market dominance.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

Two supermarket chains dominate a small country and each monitors the other's weekly promotions closely. Neither cuts headline prices deeply, because both know a price war would be matched within days and simply shrink margins across the whole sector.

2

Example

A coffee roaster in a city with dozens of independent cafes charges 15% more than the shop across the street and still fills its seats. Its customers value the roast, the room and the staff, which is monopolistic competition in action: many sellers, but each one slightly different.

3

Example

A pharmaceutical company holds a patent on a treatment with no close alternative and prices it far above manufacturing cost. When the patent expires and three generic makers enter, the price falls sharply because the imperfection that supported it has gone.

Formula

Calculation

Pricing power is measured by the Lerner Index: L = (Price - Marginal Cost) / Price. It links to demand through the optimal pricing rule: Price = Marginal Cost / (1 - 1/elasticity), where elasticity is the absolute value of price elasticity of demand. A specialist laboratory equipment maker sells an analyser for $80 per unit, and the marginal cost of producing one more unit is $48. Lerner Index = ($80 - $48) / $80 = $32 / $80 = 0.40. A value of 0.40 says that 40% of the price is margin over marginal cost, which would be impossible under perfect competition where price equals marginal cost. Working backwards through the pricing rule, the implied elasticity is 2.5, because $48 / (1 - 1/2.5) = $48 / 0.6 = $80. In words, a 1% price rise costs the firm about 2.5% of unit sales. At 50,000 units a year, total contribution = 50,000 x $32 = $1,600,000. If a rival launched a close substitute and elasticity rose to 4, the optimal price would fall to $48 / (1 - 0.25) = $64, cutting contribution per unit to $16 and reducing the Lerner Index to 0.25.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

The following scenario is illustrative and the firm is fictional. Northbeck Fasteners, an invented industrial supplier, made specialist bolts for wind turbine manufacturers and long behaved as though it sold a commodity, quoting near cost to win tenders and earning thin single-digit margins.

A new commercial director in this fictional account ran a simple analysis and found that Northbeck's parts were certified to a standard only two other suppliers held, that re-certifying an alternative supplier took a customer roughly nine months, and that the bolts represented under 2% of a turbine's cost. Those three facts described a market that was far from perfectly competitive, yet Northbeck had been pricing as if it were.

The illustrative change was modest and deliberate. Northbeck raised prices by 9% on certified lines only, held prices on genuinely commoditised stock items, and invested the extra margin in shortening lead times. Volume fell by about 3%, contribution rose materially, and the fictional post-mortem concluded the firm had been giving away pricing power it had spent a decade earning.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Treating imperfect competition as a market failure that must be corrected, when some imperfection is the normal reward for investment in brands, research and quality.
  • Assuming pricing power means charging whatever you like, when demand still slopes downward and every price rise costs volume.
  • Confusing a high margin with abuse of market power, when high margins can equally reflect low marginal costs, heavy fixed investment or genuinely better products.

Questions

People also ask.

Is imperfect competition bad for customers?

Not necessarily, because the same conditions that allow higher prices also fund product development, variety and service that a purely commoditised market would not support.

What is the difference between oligopoly and monopolistic competition?

Oligopoly has a few large firms whose decisions directly affect each other, while monopolistic competition has many firms that differentiate their offering but are too small to influence rivals individually.

How do competition regulators decide when to intervene?

They look at market share, barriers to entry, the ease of switching and evidence of coordinated or exclusionary behaviour, rather than at profitability alone.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.