What it means
Under historic cost accounting, an asset sits on the books at its purchase price until it is sold. Mark to market instead revalues it at each reporting point using an observable market price, and the difference flows through as an unrealised gain or loss.
Nothing has been sold, but the reported value changes. The reason this matters to non-finance managers is honesty of information.
A portfolio bought for $10m and now worth $6m is not really a $10m asset, and pretending otherwise delays decisions until the loss is crystallised. Mark to market forces the current reality into the numbers early.
In derivatives and futures markets it is more than an accounting convention; it is a daily cash mechanism. Positions are revalued each evening against the settlement price and the difference is actually paid between counterparties, which is why a losing futures position generates real cash outflows long before the contract expires.
The main criticism is that market prices can vanish or turn irrational. In a panic, the last traded price for an illiquid bond may reflect one distressed seller rather than fair value, and marking everything to that price can force sales that push prices lower still.
Accounting standards therefore build a hierarchy, moving from quoted prices to models when no market exists. Those model-based valuations are sometimes called mark to model, and they deserve more scrutiny than a quoted price.
When a valuation depends on assumptions chosen by the people whose bonuses depend on the answer, the discipline that makes mark to market useful is quietly weakened.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
An insurance company holds a bond portfolio bought at $220m that is worth $205m at year end after rates rise. It reports the $15m unrealised loss, which reduces reported equity even though it intends to hold every bond to maturity.
Example
A grain merchant marks its forward sales contracts and its physical stock to market each month so that hedges and inventory move together. Without this, a paper loss on the hedge would appear in one month and the offsetting gain on the grain in another.
Example
A venture fund holds a stake in a private company with no market price and values it using the most recent funding round. This is a mark-to-model estimate rather than a true market mark, and the fund discloses the judgement involved.
Think of it
“Mark to market means valuing at today's price-not what you paid, but what it's worth now.
Formula
Calculation
Mark-to-market gain or loss = (Current market price - Previous carrying price) x Quantity held
A trading firm buys 5 crude oil futures contracts, each covering 1,000 barrels, at $80.00 per barrel. Total quantity is 5 x 1,000 = 5,000 barrels, giving a notional value of 5,000 x $80.00 = $400,000.
That evening the settlement price is $78.00. The mark-to-market loss is 5,000 x ($78.00 - $80.00) = 5,000 x -$2.00 = -$10,000, and $10,000 is debited from the firm's margin account that night.
The next day the price recovers to $79.50. The gain is 5,000 x ($79.50 - $78.00) = 5,000 x $1.50 = $7,500, credited back. The cumulative position from the original $80.00 entry is 5,000 x ($79.50 - $80.00) = -$2,500, exactly matching the net of the two daily settlements.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Ashgrove Commodity Traders is an invented firm presented here as an illustrative example. It sold forward 40,000 tonnes of wheat to a miller at a fixed price and bought futures to hedge the physical grain it was still buying from farms.
Prices rose sharply over two months. The futures positions were marked to market daily and generated $1.4m of cash calls, which Ashgrove had to fund immediately, while the offsetting gain on the fixed-price sale contract would only be realised on delivery in four months.
Nothing was economically wrong with the hedge; the risk was purely one of timing. In this illustrative case, Ashgrove nearly ran out of cash despite holding a perfectly matched position, and afterwards it arranged a committed facility sized to cover the daily mark-to-market swings its hedging programme could plausibly produce.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Reading an unrealised mark-to-market loss as money already lost forever. It is a snapshot of current value, and for a held asset the outcome depends on the price when you actually sell or on the cash flows to maturity.
- Assuming a mark-to-market gain means cash is available. Outside daily-settled futures, the gain is a book entry, and spending against it before a sale can leave a business short of cash.
- Treating a model-based valuation with the same confidence as a quoted price. Values built from assumptions carry far more estimation risk and deserve tougher challenge.
Questions
People also ask.
What is the difference between mark to market and fair value?
Fair value is the broader accounting concept of what an asset would sell for in an orderly transaction, and mark to market is the version of it that uses observable market prices directly.
Does every asset get marked to market?
No, many assets such as property, plant and equipment are typically carried at cost less depreciation, while traded financial instruments are the usual candidates for market valuation.
Why do critics blame mark to market during a crisis?
Because falling prices reduce reported equity, which can force institutions to sell assets to meet capital rules, pushing prices lower and repeating the cycle.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%