What it means
Operating expenses here means the day-to-day cost of running the business: salaries, rent, utilities, marketing, insurance and administration. Most analysts strip out depreciation and amortisation, because those are accounting charges rather than cash payments, and the ratio is meant to compare cash with cash.
Mixing a cash numerator with a non-cash denominator makes the result difficult to interpret. The measure appeals to owner-managers and boards because it answers a question they actually ask: does the business fund itself?
A result of 1.20 means trading cash covered running costs with 20% to spare, which can go towards equipment, debt repayment or distributions. A result below 1.0 means something else, usually borrowing or shareholder funding, is filling the gap.
It is particularly useful for organisations without conventional profit measures. Charities, membership bodies, early-stage companies and internal service divisions often find profit ratios awkward, whereas cash covering costs is a measure everyone understands.
Non-profit boards frequently track this alongside months of reserves held. Because operating cash flow already includes many of the same payments that sit in operating expenses, the ratio is a relative indicator rather than a clean surplus calculation.
Its value comes from consistency: define the two inputs once, then watch the trend across periods. A steady decline usually means costs are growing faster than cash collection.
Seasonality and one-off receipts can distort a single period badly. A large customer prepayment or a delayed tax payment can lift the ratio in one quarter and depress it in the next, so a rolling twelve-month view is more reliable than any single reporting period.
Read it alongside cost per unit of revenue to see whether the movement came from cash timing or from real cost growth.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A membership association reports a ratio of 1.35 and its trustees agree to fund a new website from reserves, confident that ordinary operations continue to cover their own costs.
Example
A venture-backed logistics start-up posts a ratio of 0.6, showing that investor money is paying 40% of its running costs, and the board sets a target of 1.0 within eight quarters as the condition for the next funding round.
Example
A hospital group's support services division uses the ratio internally to check that recharges to clinical departments cover the cash cost of running the service, and finds a ratio of 0.94 after a wage settlement.
Think of it
“This shows if your cash flow covers your operating costs with something left over.
Formula
Calculation
Operating Cash Flow to Operating Expenses Ratio = Net Cash from Operating Activities / Cash Operating Expenses
A business services company reports net cash from operating activities of $9,600,000 for the year. Its operating expenses total $8,900,000, of which $900,000 is depreciation and amortisation, so cash operating expenses are $8,900,000 - $900,000 = $8,000,000.
Ratio = $9,600,000 / $8,000,000 = 1.20
Trading cash covered the cash cost of running the business 1.2 times over, a surplus of $9,600,000 - $8,000,000 = $1,600,000. If the company plans capital spending of $1,000,000 next year, that surplus covers it with $600,000 left, whereas a ratio of 1.05 would have produced only $400,000 and forced a borrowing decision.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Ashgrove Learning is a fictional training provider invented to illustrate this ratio. Its trustees reviewed the measure quarterly, and it had sat comfortably between 1.15 and 1.25 for three years.
In the fourth year it dropped to 0.88. The cause was not falling demand: course bookings were up. The organisation had moved from charging fees in advance to invoicing corporate clients 60 days in arrears, so cash operating expenses of $4,500,000 were being paid on time while only $3,960,000 of trading cash arrived in the same window.
Trustees approved a short-term facility to bridge the gap and reinstated a 50% deposit on corporate bookings. Within two quarters the ratio returned above 1.10. The illustrative lesson is that a business can become cash-poor while getting more popular, and this ratio catches that faster than a profit report does.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Leaving depreciation and amortisation in the denominator, which compares cash generated against a cost figure that includes charges no one ever paid.
- Reading a ratio above 1.0 as proof of profitability, when it says nothing about capital spending, interest, tax or the cost of replacing assets.
- Judging the business on one quarter, since a single large prepayment or a deferred tax bill can swing the result sharply in either direction.
Questions
People also ask.
What is a good level?
Anything meaningfully above 1.0 shows operations fund themselves, and many stable organisations aim for 1.10 to 1.30 so there is cash left for investment.
Does it work for a loss-making company?
Yes, and that is one of its uses, because a start-up can show whether it is closing the gap between cash generated and cash spent even while accounting losses continue.
Should cost of goods sold be included?
Only if you define operating expenses to include it, and the important thing is to pick one definition and apply it to every period you compare.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%