What it means
A retail chain has given raises mainly to people who ask forcefully, so two workers doing comparable roles now earn very different amounts without a clear reason. A structured pay review can expose and address such inconsistency.
Many businesses review pay annually, but there is no universal calendar, so state the normal cycle and what qualifies for an out-of-cycle decision such as a promotion, market shift or change in legal minimums. First check obligations, because employment contracts, collective agreements and local law may require certain adjustments, and a discretionary review cannot override a legal minimum or a binding contractual increase.
Then decide the budget: finance should model current base pay, likely increases and associated costs such as benefits or employer contributions. A budget of four percent of payroll is a planning pool, not an instruction that each person receives four percent.
CIPD describes pay structures as a framework for pay progression and career development, and it separates movement within a band from promotion to a higher one. A review should distinguish these decisions rather than call every rise a promotion.
Pay position within a range can also matter, since a capable employee near the band minimum might receive a different adjustment from one at the maximum, though that does not justify every historic gap and you should check how each position arose. Market information can reveal roles that are difficult to retain, provided you compare equivalent job scope, geography and reliable data sources, since a single online salary figure without context is weak evidence for changing a whole pay band.
Performance may be one input, but measures need quality, so a manager should be able to explain the evidence behind a rating rather than turning an informal impression into a supposedly objective formula, and market corrections may be needed for strong roles regardless of a single rating. Review consistency across teams by comparing people doing similar work and testing whether recommendations differ by gender or other protected characteristics under applicable law, explaining legitimate differences and correcting unsupported ones.
Manager calibration can help: teams discuss proposed increases using common criteria and identify outliers before approval, without the process becoming a contest over which manager argues loudest for their team. An illustrative pool calculation is total current payroll multiplied by the average planned base-pay increase, so $10,000,000 times 4% equals $400,000 of annualised base-pay increase if applied across that payroll, excluding related taxes, benefits and timing effects.
Actual in-year cost may differ, because a rise effective halfway through the year costs less in that financial year than a full-year figure, and payroll changes, leavers and new hires also change the baseline. A pay freeze can still involve a review, because management may decide it cannot fund discretionary increases but should check legal obligations and retention risks, and silence is not a clear policy when staff expect an annual decision.
Communicate outcomes individually and respectfully with the effective date, new amount, reason and any next review point that can be shared, never promise a future rise unless it is authorised and affordable, keep records of approvals and rationale, and restrict sensitive salary information to people who need it. For an owner, a sound pay review separates pay from performance conversations, offers a query route that catches factual mistakes without implying every request means more pay, balances affordability, retention and fairness, and sets the rules before deciding individual amounts.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A company reviews pay each January under published criteria.
Example
Finance models a four-percent annualized base-pay pool plus associated costs.
Example
Managers check market and internal pay gaps before final approvals.
Formula
Calculation
Annualised base-pay pool = current payroll x planned average increase.
Worked example. Payroll is $10,000,000 and the planned average increase is 4%, so the pool is $10,000,000 x 4% = $400,000 before benefit and timing effects. If increases take effect on 1 July, the in-year cost is $400,000 x 6/12 = $200,000. If employer on-costs add 12% to each pay rise, the full-year cost including on-costs is $400,000 x 1.12 = $448,000.
The pool is an average, not a promise to each person. For three employees earning $60,000, $50,000 and $40,000, payroll is $150,000 and a 4% pool is $6,000. A manager might allocate 5% to the first ($3,000), 4% to the second ($2,000) and 2.5% to the third ($1,000), which totals $3,000 + $2,000 + $1,000 = $6,000, exactly the pool.Case study
Seen in the real world.
This entirely fictional example follows Summit Retail, an invented chain. Raises were handled case by case, and similar roles developed unexplained gaps. The company introduced a budget, common criteria and a calibration review. It documented exceptions and explained decisions to employees. The example does not assert every worker received a raise or that a single cycle fixed all differences.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating a four-percent budget as a guaranteed four-percent rise for everyone.
- Relying only on a manager's impression without comparing comparable roles.
- Failing to explain outcomes or record why exceptions were approved.
Questions
People also ask.
What is a pay review?
A process for deciding whether and how to change pay.
What does it consider?
Budget, role and market pay, performance where relevant, obligations and fairness.
How often?
Often annually, with out-of-cycle reviews when a real trigger requires one.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%