What it means
A lender expects scheduled principal and interest, but future cash depends on the borrower, so missing payments is an obvious warning while falling sales or a major customer loss may appear earlier. A covenant breach can reveal rising leverage or weak coverage even when instalments are current.
The lender may place an exposure on a watch list, gather updated financials and reassess collateral and cash flow, with the right response depending on the reason for stress and realistic prospects of recovery. Do not equate "problem" with "non-performing".
Regulators and banks define non-performing exposures under specific criteria, which can include severe delinquency and an assessment that the borrower is unlikely to pay, with days-past-due thresholds and materiality rules varying by framework. A loan on an internal watch list may still be paying and a borrower may be troubled without a missed instalment, so use the institution's stated definition when comparing ratios across lenders.
A restructuring can change payment dates, interest or security to make repayment more feasible, but it is not a free cure. Temporary interest-only payments reduce near-term cash use but can leave principal outstanding later and may increase total interest.
A lender should compare the revised plan with likely cash generation rather than simply defer the problem, and borrowers should understand new covenants, fees and collateral requirements before agreeing. Accounting for credit losses is a separate step, in which banks and other lenders assess expected losses under their applicable reporting standards using probability, exposure and recovery information as appropriate.
An allowance is not the same as an amount already written off. Collateral may reduce loss but can take time and money to realise, and its appraised value is not guaranteed cash, so a loan's regulatory status, accounting stage and internal risk grade can differ.
For a borrower, early communication can preserve choices: prepare a short cash forecast, identify the cause of the strain and show what changes would restore payments. Avoid taking expensive new debt solely to make old instalments without a viable operating plan.
Keep paying attention to legal obligations and seek professional advice for a serious shortfall, since the lender may be willing to discuss terms but is not obliged to agree to any particular concession. For a lender, monitor trends, not only a single missed payment, comparing collections, customer concentration, covenant results and forecasts with previous periods and documenting contact and decisions consistently.
The aim is to manage risk and recover value while treating the borrower fairly under the governing rules. A low headline problem-loan ratio does not by itself prove a portfolio is safe if definitions or loan vintages differ.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A company loses a major customer and breaches a coverage covenant while payments remain current.
Example
A lender reviews a hotel loan after occupancy and cash flow fall sharply.
Example
A borrower proposes an interest-only period supported by a revised cash forecast, subject to lender approval.
Formula
Calculation
Illustrative problem-loan ratio = Gross balance of loans meeting the stated problem definition / Gross loan portfolio balance x 100
Worked example. An invented lender has $200 million in gross loans and $9 million classified as problem loans under its own policy. The ratio is $9 million / $200 million x 100 = 4.5%. If a second lender defines problem loans more narrowly and reports $6 million on a $200 million book, its ratio is 3.0%, but the two figures are not comparable until the definitions match.
State whether exposures, balances and any write-offs are included before using the measure.Case study
Seen in the real world.
This illustrative and entirely fictional example follows Bayside Catering, an invented company that lost a large contract. The owner initially hoped demand would recover and did not discuss a forecast shortfall with its bank. Two payments were missed, and the bank began a closer credit review. The company prepared a weekly cash forecast, cost reductions and a plan for replacing the contract.
In the invented outcome, the bank agreed to six months of interest-only payments after reviewing the plan and its own risk. Principal still had to be repaid later, and the company tracked milestones with the lender. Recovery was possible because new orders arrived; it was not guaranteed by the restructuring itself. The case shows why early evidence and realistic cash planning matter more than simply naming a loan 'problematic'.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating every watch-list loan as formally non-performing under every framework.
- Assuming a payment extension erases the debt or the underlying risk.
- Using collateral value as if it were immediate, certain recovery cash.
Questions
People also ask.
What is a problem loan?
A loan with signs of repayment stress that warrants closer assessment under a lender's policy.
Is it necessarily in default?
No. Warning signs may appear before a missed payment or legal default.
What can a borrower do?
Speak with the lender early and provide an honest cash forecast and recovery plan; any change needs agreement.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%