What it means
The calculation divides total revenue for a period by the average number of employees in that period. A higher figure suggests that each person is supporting more sales, which can mean better systems, stronger products or a leaner team.
Investors and managers use the measure as a starting point for questions about efficiency. If revenue per employee is falling while the company is hiring, it may be adding people faster than it is adding sales.
Boards often ask for the trend over at least three years. The number needs context because industries differ greatly.
A software company or a trading firm can generate large revenue with few staff, while a restaurant or a care home needs many staff for each dollar of sales. Comparing across industries is rarely useful.
Averages hide important detail. Using the headcount at the end of the year can distort the result if the company hired many people late, so the average of start and end figures, or a monthly average, is better.
Part-time workers can be counted as full-time equivalents. The measure can also mislead.
A company that outsources work to contractors shows fewer employees and a higher figure without being more efficient, and a high number may mean employees are overstretched. Pairing it with profit per employee gives a fuller picture.
Managers use revenue per employee when planning hiring, setting targets and judging acquisitions. A rising trend is generally positive, provided that quality and staff retention are not being harmed along the way.
A sharp fall should lead to questions about whether new hires have been productive.
In practice
Real-world examples
Example 1
An online retailer with 40 staff earns $12,000,000 of revenue, or $300,000 per employee. A traditional shop chain with the same revenue and 200 staff earns $60,000 per employee. The gap reflects different business models rather than better management. The retailer's staff handle few physical tasks because customers use the website.
Example 2
A consulting firm compares its revenue per consultant of $220,000 with a rival's $260,000. The partners discover that their consultants spend more time on unbilled work, such as proposals and internal meetings. They introduce time tracking and a utilisation target. Within a year the gap narrows to $15,000 per consultant.
Example 3
A manufacturer is considering buying a smaller competitor with 50 employees and $4,000,000 of revenue. The target earns $80,000 per employee, below the manufacturer's own $140,000. The buyer includes cost savings in its valuation and plans to improve the target's productivity. It checks the plan with the target's managers before bidding.
Think of it
Revenue per employee shows how much sales each worker supports on average-workforce efficiency.
Formula
Calculation
Revenue per employee = Total revenue / Average number of employees
Average employees = (Employees at start + Employees at end) / 2
Suppose a company starts the year with 110 employees and ends with 130, so average headcount is (110 + 130) / 2 = 120. Revenue for the year is $18,000,000. Revenue per employee is 18,000,000 / 120 = $150,000. If revenue rises to $19,800,000 with the same average headcount, the figure becomes 19,800,000 / 120 = $165,000, an increase of 10%.Case study
Seen in the real world
Lakeshore Logistics is an illustrative, fictional delivery company that grew from 80 to 140 employees in two years. Revenue grew from $9,600,000 to $14,000,000 over the same period.
Revenue per employee fell from 9,600,000 / 80 = $120,000 to 14,000,000 / 140 = $100,000. The finance director showed the board that the company had added drivers and office staff faster than it had won work.
The board paused hiring, introduced route-planning software and set a target of $115,000 per employee within a year. The target was reviewed each quarter alongside customer satisfaction scores. In this illustrative story, the measure was not a performance rating for individuals but a signal that the company needed better systems. Staff were told this at the outset so that the number would not cause alarm. Managers were also asked to explain any large differences between depots, which turned out to reflect route length rather than effort.
Watch out
Common mistakes
- Comparing the figure for companies in different industries, which have very different needs for staff and equipment.
- Using year-end headcount in the calculation after a period of rapid hiring, which makes the ratio look artificially low.
- Treating a higher figure as automatically better, when it may reflect outsourcing, overworked staff or a temporary surge in sales.
Questions
People also ask
What is a good revenue per employee?
It depends on the industry, and the best benchmark is a group of similar companies or the company's own past results. Trade bodies and annual reports are useful sources.
Should contractors be included in the headcount?
For a fair comparison, many analysts count them as full-time equivalents, but the approach should be consistent.
How does revenue per employee differ from profit per employee?
Revenue per employee measures sales productivity, while profit per employee shows how much of that revenue remains after costs. A company can score well on the first and poorly on the second.
Watch