Back to Glossary

Entry · Business

SBTi

The SBTi, or Science Based Targets initiative, is the body that defines what counts as a credible corporate emissions reduction target and then validates whether a company's target meets that definition. A company submits its proposed target, the SBTi assesses it against published criteria, and only approved targets may be described as science-based.

What it means

The initiative exists because emissions pledges were, for years, impossible to compare. One company promised to be carbon neutral, another to cut intensity per unit of output, and a third to reduce emissions by an unspecified amount at an unspecified date.

The SBTi replaced that with a single test: is the target consistent with limiting global warming in line with the Paris Agreement? Practically, the SBTi publishes sector criteria and methods, most commonly the absolute contraction approach, which requires a minimum percentage cut in absolute emissions every year.

It also sets rules on which emissions must be included, how far ahead a target may run, and when a target must be recalculated after an acquisition or a major structural change. The scope rules are the part that most often surprises companies.

Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions must both be covered, and if Scope 3 emissions from the supply chain and product use account for more than 40% of the total, they must be included too. For most consumer and manufacturing businesses Scope 3 dominates, so the target reaches well beyond the company's own sites.

The business reasons for pursuing validation are usually commercial rather than philosophical. Large customers increasingly require validated targets from suppliers, lenders link pricing to them, and index providers and investors use them as a filter.

A validated target is a credential that opens procurement doors rather than a purely reputational badge. There is genuine nuance about what the SBTi does and does not do.

It validates the target, not the company's performance against it, so approval says the goal is credible rather than that the company is on track. Progress still has to be measured, reported and independently checked by the company and its stakeholders.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A packaging manufacturer wins a tender with a large grocery retailer only after confirming it has an SBTi-validated near-term target. The retailer's own Scope 3 target depends on supplier reductions, so validation became a condition of the contract.

2

Example

A commercial property group submits a target covering the energy used in buildings it owns and operates. Because tenant electricity makes up a large share of its footprint, the target has to extend into Scope 3, and the group renegotiates its standard lease to include data sharing.

3

Example

A software business finds that its own operations are tiny but that purchased cloud services and business travel dominate its footprint. Its validated target therefore centres on supplier engagement and a revised travel policy rather than on its offices.

Think of it

SBTi validates that your climate targets are real-the organization checking if targets are science-based.

Formula

Calculation

Target emissions = Base year emissions x (1 - (Annual reduction rate x Number of years)) The absolute contraction approach commonly requires a linear cut of at least 4.2% of base year emissions each year to align with a 1.5C pathway. Take a company with base year 2020 emissions of 50,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, setting a target year of 2030. That is a ten-year period, so the required cut is 4.2% x 10 = 42%. Target emissions are 50,000 x (1 - 0.42) = 50,000 x 0.58 = 29,000 tonnes. The absolute reduction required is 50,000 - 29,000 = 21,000 tonnes over the decade, or an average of 2,100 tonnes a year.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

This is an illustrative and fictional example. Arden Foods Group, an invented mid-sized food producer, announced a plan to be carbon neutral by 2030 and was surprised when two supermarket customers asked whether the target had been validated.

The internal review was uncomfortable. Roughly 78% of Arden's emissions sat in agricultural raw materials, which the original pledge had ignored entirely, and the remaining reductions relied heavily on buying offsets rather than cutting anything. Under SBTi criteria neither approach would pass, because offsets do not count towards the required reduction and Scope 3 could not be excluded at that share of the total.

Arden rebuilt the target around a 42% absolute cut by 2030 from a 2020 base, added a supplier engagement plan covering its twelve largest ingredient providers, and had the target validated eleven months later. The illustrative lesson is that the discipline of validation forced the company to confront where its emissions actually were, which the original announcement had allowed it to avoid.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Using the phrase science-based target for any climate goal. The term has a specific meaning tied to validation against published criteria, and using it loosely creates a real greenwashing exposure.
  • Assuming offsets can do the heavy lifting. Carbon credits do not count towards the required emissions reduction under SBTi criteria; they may only address residual emissions beyond the reduction pathway.
  • Leaving Scope 3 out of scope. If supply chain and product emissions exceed 40% of the total, they must be included, and for most companies they do.

Questions

People also ask.

How long does validation take?

It commonly runs to several months from submission, and longer if the company's inventory or base year data needs rework before assessment.

Does the SBTi check whether targets are met?

No, it validates the target itself; ongoing progress must be measured and disclosed by the company through its own reporting and assurance arrangements.

Is validation only for large corporations?

No, there is a streamlined route for small and medium-sized enterprises with simplified criteria and a lighter assessment process.

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · September 5, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.