What it means
The construction is straightforward: pick a call strike above the share price, pick a put strike below it, buy both, and wait. Because neither option has any immediate value, the premiums are cheaper than the equivalent straddle, which lets a trader cover more contracts for the same outlay.
The position is sometimes described as buying insurance against calm. The trade-off is a wider dead zone.
If the price finishes anywhere between the two strikes, both options expire worthless and the entire premium is lost, whereas a straddle at least retains some value unless the price lands exactly on the strike. Traders choose a strangle over a straddle when they expect a very large move and want maximum exposure per dollar spent.
It suits situations such as a takeover rumour, a binary regulatory outcome or a currency under obvious pressure, where a small move is not really on the menu. Selling a strangle is a common income strategy that reverses the logic.
The seller collects both premiums and keeps everything if the price stays inside the strikes, which happens most of the time, but a single violent move can produce a loss many times the premium collected. The distance between the two strikes is the main design choice.
Wider strikes cost less and pay off less often, narrower strikes cost more and behave more like a straddle, and most traders settle the question by looking at how far the asset has moved around similar events in the past.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A hedge fund expecting a currency peg to break buys strangles on the exchange rate at strikes 8% either side of the current level. Nothing happens for three months and the premium is lost, then the peg breaks in the fourth month and the position returns several times its cost.
Example
A trader anticipating a hostile bid buys a strangle on the target company rather than a straddle, because a bid would move the share 30% while no bid would leave it flat. The cheaper structure lets him hold four times as many contracts for the same budget.
Example
An options income desk sells monthly strangles on a large index fund with strikes roughly 6% either side of the market. The strategy earns a steady premium for eleven months and then gives most of it back during a sharp correction.
Think of it
“Strangle is a cheaper big-move bet-buying OTM calls and puts at different strikes.
Formula
Calculation
Cost of a long strangle = call premium + put premium. Upper breakeven = call strike + total premium; lower breakeven = put strike - total premium.
A share trades at $100 ahead of an arbitration ruling. A trader buys a $110 call for $3.00 and a $90 put for $2.50, a total premium of $5.50 per share, so one contract covering 100 shares costs 100 x $5.50 = $550.
The breakevens are $110 + $5.50 = $115.50 above and $90 - $5.50 = $84.50 below. If the ruling is favourable and the share closes at $130 on expiry, the call is worth $130 - $110 = $20 while the put expires worthless, so the profit is $20 - $5.50 = $14.50 per share, or 100 x $14.50 = $1,450 on a $550 outlay.
If the share instead finishes at $104, both options expire worthless and the trader loses the full $550. That is the entire risk of the long position, and it is also the reason the same trade repeated many times can bleed capital in quiet markets.Case study
Seen in the real world.
This is an illustrative and clearly fictional example. Redwing Macro Partners, an invented small fund, believed a heavily indebted listed retailer would either secure refinancing and rally hard or fail outright within a quarter. Its fictional analysts calculated that a straddle at the $40 money would cost $7.20 per share, more than the fund wanted to risk.
Instead they bought a $50 call at $1.80 and a $30 put at $1.60, a strangle costing $3.40 per share across 500 contracts, or $170,000 in total. The refinancing failed, the share collapsed to $11, and the puts settled at $30 - $11 = $19 per share, worth 500 x 100 x $19 = $950,000 gross against the $170,000 paid.
The invented risk committee noted afterwards that the same structure had been tried on two earlier situations and expired worthless both times, at a combined cost of $240,000. Read across all three trades, the illustrative outcome was still strongly positive, which is exactly how a strategy built on rare large payoffs is supposed to be judged.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Comparing a strangle with a straddle on price alone, without noticing that the cheaper position needs a much larger move to reach breakeven.
- Selling strangles for regular income and treating the frequent small wins as evidence of low risk, when the rare loss is the whole story.
- Choosing strikes based on round numbers rather than on how far the asset has historically moved around comparable events.
Questions
People also ask.
What is the difference between a strangle and a straddle?
A straddle uses the same strike for both options, while a strangle uses a higher call strike and a lower put strike, making it cheaper but requiring a bigger move.
Can you lose more than the premium on a long strangle?
No, the most a buyer can lose is the two premiums paid, though a seller of a strangle faces a far larger potential loss.
Why do strangles often expire worthless?
Because the price finishes between the two strikes most of the time, which is precisely why sellers are willing to write them.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%