What it means
In a crisis, banks become reluctant to lend to each other, and short-term funding can dry up. The Federal Reserve normally lends through its discount window (a standing facility for banks), but many banks avoided it because borrowing there could signal weakness.
The Term Auction Facility offered an alternative. The central bank announced an amount, eligible banks submitted bids stating how much they wanted and what rate they would pay, and the funds were allocated to the highest bidders until the amount ran out.
Because every successful bidder paid the same final rate, the auction produced a market-based price. Borrowers had to provide acceptable collateral (assets pledged as security), which protected the central bank if a bank failed to repay.
The programme was designed to be temporary and it was wound down as markets recovered. It is mainly studied as an example of how a central bank can reach banks that are unwilling to use a standard lending window.
For businesses, the relevance is indirect. When banks have stable funding they keep lending to companies, so measures like this help protect credit supply to ordinary borrowers during a downturn.
The facility is often remembered alongside other emergency lending schemes from the same period. Together they showed that a central bank can support the whole system by providing liquidity (ready cash) rather than by rescuing individual firms, and they shaped later thinking on crisis tools.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A regional bank is worried about funding because its usual wholesale lenders have pulled back. It bids at an auction and wins money for four weeks, which allows it to keep making loans to local businesses. The bank repays the money on the due date and bids again only if it still needs funds.
Example
A large bank that did not want to be seen using the discount window bids anonymously in an auction. The anonymity lowered the stigma, so more banks were willing to take part. Reducing the stigma was one of the main reasons the auction format was chosen.
Example
A business-school lecturer uses the facility as a case study in a central banking course. Students compare the auction rate with the usual policy rate to see how stress was priced in. The discussion shows why timing and design matter as much as size.
Formula
Calculation
Interest cost = amount borrowed x auction rate x days / 360
A bank wins $360,000,000 in an auction at a rate of 3.00% for a term of 28 days.
Interest = 360,000,000 x 0.03 x 28 / 360 = $840,000
The bank repays $360,840,000 at the end of the 28 days.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Meridian Community Bank is an illustrative, fictional lender that relied heavily on short-term borrowing from other banks. When that funding became scarce, the treasurer feared the bank might need to stop approving small business loans.
She arranged to bid in a central bank term auction, pledging a portfolio of high-quality loans as collateral. The bank won $150,000,000 for four weeks and rolled over the borrowing in later auctions.
Small business lending continued, and the bank rebuilt its funding base from other sources. The illustrative lesson is that term funding gave the bank time, which is often what a liquidity problem needs most. Within a year the bank had restored its normal funding and no longer needed to bid. The treasurer later told her board that the programme had mattered less for the rate she paid than for the confidence it gave staff, customers and other lenders that the bank could meet its obligations.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating the facility as a permanent central bank product, when it was an emergency programme. It was launched in response to the 2007-2008 crisis and wound down as conditions improved.
- Assuming any company could borrow from it, when only eligible banks could bid. Eligible banks had to pledge acceptable collateral, so the facility was not a route to unsecured central bank funding.
- Believing the rate was fixed by the central bank, when it was set by the auction. The bidders competed on price, and the final rate depended on how much demand there was for the amount offered.
Questions
People also ask.
Why was an auction used instead of a fixed rate?
An auction lets the market reveal the right price for funds and avoids the central bank guessing it. In practice it let the central bank allocate a known quantity of funds while leaving the price to bidders. The auction rate was also a useful signal of how stressed the funding market was.
What did banks have to pledge?
They had to provide collateral acceptable to the central bank, so the loans were secured. The collateral was valued with a margin of safety so the central bank was protected from price falls.
Is the programme still running?
No, it was a temporary crisis measure that was wound down, though similar tools can be used in future. Central banks keep a range of tools ready, and similar term lending can be reintroduced if conditions require.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%Related