What it means
One company in a group makes a tax loss while another makes a taxable profit, and depending on local law the group may be able to move eligible losses to reduce the profitable company's tax base. The UK calls a related mechanism group relief and requires a surrendering company and a claimant company, while the UAE has a loss-transfer rule with specific 75% ownership and utilisation conditions.
These are separate regimes, so never apply one country's tests to another. Start with a tax loss, because an accounting loss is not automatically a tax loss and adjustments for exempt income and nondeductible costs may change it.
Then identify the loss year, since some rules allow current-year surrender while others also cover carried-forward losses under different conditions. A company may need to use its own carried-forward losses before transferring remaining amounts, so track prior claims and match the period.
Check the group relationship and the entities involved. The UAE uses at least 75% ownership in specified configurations over a defined period and requires both entities to use the same accounting standards, while UK rules use their own relationship tests and other jurisdictions impose different comparability tests.
A foreign subsidiary may sit outside a domestic transfer regime, UAE official guidance excludes natural persons and certain nonresident persons, and tax-free or special-zone entities can face exclusions, so verify the recipient and the surrendering entity separately. Next, test capacity and consent.
UAE rules generally limit total loss offset from all sources to 75% of the recipient's taxable income for the period, which is not a global cap, and the company surrendering a loss may need to agree to the claim because group ownership does not erase separate legal identities. Once an amount is transferred and used, the original company cannot also use it, so keep a shared loss ledger.
Watch for restrictions and timing. Anti-trafficking rules may restrict losses after a change in control or business activity, some losses from exempt or restricted activities cannot be transferred, and group relationships and accounting periods may not line up.
Tax returns, elections and supporting records may be required, because an internal journal entry is not enough. Measure the benefit cautiously.
A transfer can reduce taxable income, but the actual saving depends on rates, thresholds and other reliefs, group companies may agree compensation for surrendered losses (which needs tax and corporate-law review), and a loss surrendered today may no longer offset the loss company's later profits. Even when transfer is allowed the companies remain separate taxpayers, so keep ownership charts, loss schedules, consent and computations to support each claim, and reconcile group-wide amounts annually.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A UK company with a tax loss surrenders eligible losses to a group claimant under its group-relief rules. The claimant offsets them against its own taxable profit, and both companies record the amount in the claim so it cannot be used twice.
Example
A UAE group checks 75% ownership across the companies and the recipient's 75% taxable-income cap before filing. The finance team also confirms that both entities use the same accounting standards and are not excluded special-zone entities.
Example
A newly acquired loss company is reviewed for anti-trafficking restrictions after a change in control. The advisers find that the acquired business changed activity, so they treat the losses as potentially restricted rather than assuming they can be used.
Formula
Calculation
Illustrative tax effect = eligible loss actually offset x applicable marginal tax rate. A $100,000 offset at a hypothetical 20% rate suggests $100,000 x 20% = $20,000 before thresholds and other rules; it is not a universal saving.
Now apply a recipient cap of the UAE type. If the recipient has taxable income of $400,000 for the period, a 75% limit on total loss offset allows at most $400,000 x 75% = $300,000. If the group wants to surrender $350,000 of losses, only $300,000 can be used that period, and the remaining $50,000 stays with the surrendering company subject to its own carry-forward rules. At the same hypothetical 20% rate the usable $300,000 would reduce tax by $60,000.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Entirely fictional case: Aurora Group has one profitable company and one loss-making company. It first calculates tax losses rather than using accounting losses. The local adviser checks ownership, periods, caps and consent before filing. Aurora keeps a ledger so the same loss is not used twice.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating an accounting loss as automatically transferable.
- Applying one country's group-ownership threshold or offset cap worldwide.
- Using the same loss in both group companies.
Questions
People also ask.
What is a transfer of tax losses?
A rule allowing eligible tax losses to be used by another eligible company.
Are ownership and loss rules the same everywhere?
No. Group links, loss types, periods and caps vary by jurisdiction.
Does a transfer always produce an immediate tax saving?
It can reduce taxable income, but the actual tax effect depends on all local rules.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%