What it means
A warehouse receives a pallet and the system directs it to aisle four. The worker places it in aisle five without updating the record.
The stock exists, but a picker searching aisle four will lose time and may report a false shortage. Oracle warehouse documentation describes directed putaway using pallet or case labels and location barcode scans, as well as controlled location overrides and capacity checks.
These are software features, not proof of physical correctness. Define accuracy so that a putaway is correct when the item, quantity, lot or serial status and recorded physical location match the approved placement rule, and count putaway tasks verified correct divided by sampled or completed tasks under a stated method.
Separate direction from execution, since a system suggestion is not a completed movement and the actual bin must be confirmed with a physical scan or verified check. Check licence plates, because a pallet ID can carry multiple SKUs or lots and the identifier must map to the actual contents, and check scan behaviour since a worker can scan a printed location code away from the rack.
Handle overrides carefully: another safe location may be allowed, but the worker must record it, because an unlogged exception breaks inventory visibility. Respect capacity, quality status and lot restrictions: a bin that appears empty in software may be physically full or unsafe, quarantined or inspection-pending goods should not move into available pick stock without authorisation, and expiry, recall and temperature rules may make a physically open bin ineligible.
Follow racking limits and report any mismatch between software and floor. Record timing, because goods left in receiving after a putaway task closes may be shown as available, so confirm physical completion before updating inventory.
Use sampling responsibly, because a small spot check cannot prove every pallet is correct, so show the sample size and how locations were selected. Track misplacement by type, since incorrect bin, SKU, quantity and status require different fixes and a generic error category hides causes, and consider mixed pallets, where a split putaway may send parts of one pallet to several locations so each child movement must be tracked.
When putaway strategy changes, compare error and travel outcomes on similar goods, and protect traceability for regulated or lot-controlled items, because a high scan rate alone is not success. Link putaway to picking, replenishment and receiving, since misplaced stock often appears later as pick failure or cycle count variance, reserve stock in the wrong location can stop timely movement to pick faces, and an incorrect received quantity or mislabelled pallet can make putaway seem wrong even when the location scan was right.
Review travel efficiency separately, because a correct but inconvenient bin may increase picker time and slotting quality is a different metric, and avoid blame from one error since poor labels, device lag and congested aisles can contribute while master-data staff may need to fix incorrect location rules. Train staff for blocked, unsafe or full bins, use independent checks for high-value, hazardous or cold-chain goods, and update dimensions and permitted product classes whenever a location is reconfigured, so that a correct scan cannot direct stock into an unsuitable bin and the digital warehouse stays aligned with the real one.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A pallet scanned into aisle four is actually found in aisle five.
Example
A blocked target bin prompts a recorded override to a safe location.
Example
Quarantined stock stays separate from available pick inventory.
Formula
Calculation
Illustrative verified accuracy = correct checked putaways / checked putaways x 100. Ninety-seven of one hundred sampled tasks = 97% for that sample.
Worked example. An auditor selects 100 completed putaway tasks at random and visits each bin. Ninety-seven have the right item, quantity, status and location, and three fail: two in the wrong bin and one with the wrong status.
Accuracy = 97 / 100 x 100 = 97%. The three failures are 3% of the sample, and because only 100 tasks were checked the report also states the sample size and how the tasks were chosen.Case study
Seen in the real world.
This entirely fictional example follows Willow Warehouse. Pickers reported empty bins while reserve pallets existed elsewhere. A sample check found that location overrides were not always recorded, so operations improved scanning and exception training. The case does not set a universal target for accuracy.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Treating a suggested bin as proof of completed placement.
- Using an unrecorded override when the target is full.
- Releasing quality-held stock merely because it was put away.
Questions
People also ask.
What must match?
Physical goods, approved bin and system record for item, quantity and status.
Can workers override a location?
Only through a documented safe workflow under site rules.
How is accuracy checked?
Sample or verify actual placements against records, with sample size shown.
From the founder's library

Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%