What it means
An employee submits an expense claim, and a system checks required fields, routes it to the right manager and records an approval before finance pays it. Automation removes repeated manual handoffs, while the manager still makes the decision the policy assigns to them.
IBM describes workflow automation, and Microsoft documents approval workflows in a product implementation; their examples show common patterns, but the exact permissions and actions depend on the business's process and tools. Map the current process from request to completion, asking which steps exist for control, information or habit, and remove needless steps before automating them, because copying a slow or confusing process into software may make its problems harder to change.
Define the trigger, such as a form submission, approved order or other verifiable event, since a vague condition can fire at the wrong time or repeat after an event is edited. List each state and transition so that staff know whether a request is draft, pending, approved, rejected or complete.
Assign decision rights by role, since an automated route does not grant a bot authority to approve spending. Validate required information at the right point, with a form that explains errors rather than silently discarding work.
Include exceptions such as absent approvers, missing data and urgent requests, and set escalation and deadlines where useful, because ordinary operations rarely follow only one happy path and a request should not remain hidden in one person's inbox while the requester waits. Connect systems through suitable APIs or tools where available, since screen-based automation may be more fragile, and use least-privilege access for service accounts, because a workflow that can read every customer record creates unnecessary exposure.
Check the audience of automated notices so that a confirmation intended for the requester does not go to an unrelated team, and limit sensitive data in notifications, since a link to an authorised system can be safer than copying full records into email. Make retries safe, because a timeout after a purchase-order creation must not lead to a duplicate order, and record who requested, reviewed and changed each step so that a trustworthy audit trail helps resolve disputes.
Test the flow with normal and edge cases before release, including changes of approver, cancellation and failed integrations, and monitor queues and failures after launch, because a workflow can appear to accept a form while its downstream action fails. Plan a human fallback when a critical service is down, and make sure it still respects approval and record rules.
Measure cycle time, errors and customer or employee experience, not only the number of automated steps, since a shorter approval time can be good but a rushed reviewer may miss important evidence. Review process ownership when teams reorganise, because routing rules can become stale after a manager moves.
Automation may reduce repetitive labour and free time for judgment, but do not claim savings before measuring support and exception work, and keep human review where actions have legal, financial or reputational consequences. For external communications, approved wording, recipient and trigger matter, and a workflow should not invent or broaden a message, while documenting the rules and version changes tells users which policy applied to an older request.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A fictional company routes an expense claim to a manager, then to finance only after the approval is recorded. The finance team never sees an unapproved claim. The audit trail shows who approved it and when.
Example
A fictional manufacturer returns an incomplete supplier request to the requester with a clear explanation of the missing field. The requester fixes it the same day. The request does not sit in a queue waiting for someone to notice.
Example
A fictional retailer pauses a purchase order when an integration fails, rather than retrying blindly and creating two orders. An owner is alerted and checks the supplier system before releasing it. The fallback keeps the approval and record rules intact.
Formula
Calculation
There is no standard workflow-automation formula, but two simple measures help. Average cycle time = sum of (completion timestamp - valid request timestamp) for completed requests / number of completed requests, with failed and cancelled requests reported separately. Net monthly time saving = requests per month x minutes saved per request / 60 x hourly cost - hours of support and exception work x hourly cost.
Worked example with assumed figures. A finance team completes 50 expense claims in a sample that took 150 days in total before automation, an average of 150 / 50 = 3.0 days. After automation, the same 50 claims take 100 days in total, an average of 100 / 50 = 2.0 days. Eight other requests failed or were cancelled and are reported separately rather than averaged in.
For time saved, suppose 600 claims a month each save 6 minutes of manual handling, which is 600 x 6 = 3,600 minutes, or 60 hours. At $30 per hour the gross saving is 60 x $30 = $1,800. If the team spends 15 hours a month on support and exceptions, that costs 15 x $30 = $450, so the net saving is $1,800 - $450 = $1,350 a month.Case study
Seen in the real world.
In this fictional case, Elm Services automated expense routing. Testing found that a departed manager remained an approver, so the team fixed ownership and added a stale-route alert before rollout. The case is invented. After launch, Elm monitored queues and found that a few claims were accepted by the form but failed in the payment step.
It assigned an owner to those failures and used a safe retry so that no claim was paid twice. It reported cycle time with failed and cancelled claims shown separately. The team also noted that a workflow system can orchestrate a process across apps, while robotic process automation may imitate screen actions within one step. The goal is reliable movement of work with clear authority, visible exceptions and a record of the actual outcome.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Automating an unclear process without redesign.
- Letting a bot approve decisions outside its authority.
- Counting a submitted form as a completed downstream action.
Questions
People also ask.
Is this the same as RPA?
No. RPA can perform a step through a user interface; workflow automation coordinates the wider process.
Can approvals be automated?
Routing and recording can be automated, while decision rights follow the actual policy.
How are failures handled?
Monitor them, assign an owner, use safe retries and keep a controlled fallback.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%