What it means
The logic of DDU is to split the journey at the customs border. The seller carries the goods, and the risk attached to them, all the way to the destination, while the buyer takes on the importer's obligations and the tax bill that comes with them.
That split matters because import charges can be large and are often invisible in the purchase price. A buyer who compares a DDU quotation with a fully delivered price without adding duty and non-recoverable tax will consistently pick the wrong supplier.
DDU also has a customer service dimension. Consumers buying online under DDU terms may be asked for a duty payment before a courier will hand over the parcel, and a surprising share of those parcels are refused, which is why many cross-border retailers now quote duty-paid prices instead.
The 2010 Incoterms revision folded DDU into Delivered At Place, which says essentially the same thing in cleaner language and works for any mode of transport. Contracts written after that date should use the current term, though the older wording remains legally workable if both parties understand it.
For finance teams, the practical task is to model the buyer's full cash outlay and then strip out any recoverable tax. Import value added tax is often reclaimable by a registered business, so the cash cost and the profit and loss cost of a DDU shipment can be very different numbers.
In practice
Real-world examples.
Example
A hobby electronics store imports components on DDU terms and receives a courier invoice for duty and tax two weeks after each delivery. Because these bills arrive late, the owner initially undercosts the products and prices them too cheaply. Adding an estimated import charge to every purchase order fixes the margin problem.
Example
A clothing brand shipping to overseas consumers on a duty-unpaid basis sees roughly one in eight parcels refused at the door when buyers are asked for an unexpected charge. Switching to a duty-paid checkout price raises the headline price but cuts returns and refund handling sharply.
Example
A machinery buyer negotiates DDU rather than a fully delivered price because it holds a duty deferment account and can settle import charges monthly rather than per shipment. The arrangement improves working capital without changing the underlying cost.
Formula
Calculation
Buyer's cash outlay = DDU invoice + import duty + import tax + clearance fees
Buyer's net cost = cash outlay - recoverable import tax
Worked example. A retailer buys a shipment on DDU terms for $320,000. The destination customs authority assesses duty on a declared customs value of $300,000, which reflects the goods, freight and insurance as reported on the entry.
Import duty at 7% is $300,000 x 0.07 = $21,000. Import value added tax at 20% is charged on the customs value plus duty, so ($300,000 + $21,000) x 0.20 = $321,000 x 0.20 = $64,200. Customs brokerage costs $1,500.
Cash outlay = $320,000 + $21,000 + $64,200 + $1,500 = $406,700.
The retailer is registered for value added tax and can reclaim the $64,200, so the net cost is $406,700 - $64,200 = $342,500. That is 7.0% above the DDU invoice, which is the figure that should be used when comparing suppliers.Case study
Seen in the real world.
Meridian Lighting is a fictional importer created for this illustrative example. It bought fittings on DDU terms and recorded only the supplier invoice in its product costing sheet, treating duty and clearance as general overhead. Gross margin looked healthy at 38%.
When a new finance manager reallocated the import charges back to the products that generated them, the picture changed. One high-volume range attracted a duty rate more than double the company average, and its true gross margin was closer to 21%, while a slower-selling premium range was quietly the most profitable line.
Meridian repriced the low-margin range and renegotiated with the supplier, recovering several points of margin within two quarters. The illustrative point is that duty is a product cost, not an overhead, and hiding it inside general expenses distorts every pricing decision that follows.
Watch out
Common mistakes.
- Comparing a DDU price directly with a duty-paid price. The DDU figure excludes duty, import tax and clearance, so it always looks cheaper than it is.
- Booking import duty as a general overhead. Duty rates vary by product, so spreading them evenly across a catalogue hides which lines are actually profitable.
- Using DDU in a new contract. It was withdrawn from the Incoterms rules in 2010, and Delivered At Place is the current equivalent.
Questions
People also ask.
Is DDU the same as Delivered At Place?
Practically yes, since both have the seller deliver to a named destination while the buyer clears the goods and pays duty, and Delivered At Place is the current wording.
Who is responsible if goods are damaged in transit under DDU?
The seller is, because risk passes only when the goods arrive at the named destination ready for unloading.
Why do couriers still advertise DDU shipping?
It is convenient shorthand for a duty-unpaid service in which the receiver is billed on arrival, even though it is no longer an official Incoterms rule.
From the founder's library
Take it further with the book.
Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.
25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.
View the book and save 25%