Back to Glossary

Entry · Ratios

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

The fixed charge coverage ratio is the specific calculated metric that lenders use to test whether a borrower can meet interest, lease payments and scheduled debt repayments out of its cash earnings. It appears in loan agreements as a covenant with a minimum level the borrower must maintain.

A ratio of 1.0 means earnings exactly cover the charges, with nothing to spare.

What it means

This is the version of fixed charge coverage that appears in credit documents rather than textbooks. Because it drives whether a company is in default, its definition is written out precisely in the loan agreement, and that written definition always outranks any standard formula.

The lender's version usually starts from cash earnings rather than accounting profit. A common construction takes earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, subtracts cash taxes and maintenance capital spending, then divides by interest, scheduled principal repayments and rent.

The subtraction of capital spending and taxes is the point that surprises borrowers. Money spent keeping the machines running and money paid to the tax authority is genuinely unavailable to service debt, so a lender insists on removing it before measuring cover.

Typical covenant levels sit between 1.10 and 1.35 times for leveraged borrowers, with headroom above that expected in the base case. Breaching the covenant rarely means immediate repayment, but it hands the lender the right to reprice, restrict dividends or demand additional security.

The practical nuance is the testing basis. Most agreements test quarterly on a rolling twelve-month basis, which smooths seasonality but also means a single bad quarter can affect four consecutive test dates, so treasury teams model the ratio forwards rather than only reporting it backwards.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A distribution company negotiating a $10,000,000 facility asks the bank to exclude growth capital spending from the calculation, keeping only maintenance spend in the formula. The change lifts its projected ratio from 1.18 to 1.41 and allows the covenant to be set at a level both sides can live with.

2

Example

A care home operator breaches its 1.20 covenant at 1.06 after an agency staffing crisis. Rather than calling the loan, the bank agrees a waiver in exchange for a suspension of dividends and a fee, which is the most common outcome of a technical breach.

3

Example

A private equity backed retailer models the ratio monthly for eighteen months ahead. The forecast shows a dip to 1.22 in the quarter after a planned refit, so the finance director phases the refit spending across two quarters and keeps the tested figure above 1.35 throughout.

Think of it

Fixed charge coverage shows if earnings can cover all fixed payments-interest, leases, preferred dividends.

Formula

Calculation

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio = (EBITDA - Maintenance capital expenditure - Cash taxes) / (Interest + Scheduled principal repayments + Rent and lease payments) Worked example: a food processing group reports EBITDA of $5,000,000 for the trailing twelve months. Maintenance capital spending was $800,000 and cash taxes paid were $700,000. The numerator is $5,000,000 - $800,000 - $700,000 = $3,500,000. Its fixed charges for the same period were interest of $600,000, scheduled loan principal of $900,000 and rent of $500,000. The denominator is $600,000 + $900,000 + $500,000 = $2,000,000. The ratio is $3,500,000 / $2,000,000 = 1.75 times, comfortably above a covenant set at 1.25 times. To find the breaking point, multiply the denominator by the covenant level: $2,000,000 x 1.25 = $2,500,000 of required cash earnings. EBITDA could therefore fall to $2,500,000 + $800,000 + $700,000 = $4,000,000, a decline of 20%, before the covenant is breached.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

Halden Foods is a fictional ready-meals producer used purely as an illustrative example. It signed a $16,000,000 facility with a fixed charge coverage covenant of 1.25 times, tested quarterly, and opened with a comfortable 1.9 times at completion.

Eighteen months later a major supermarket customer moved to a new supplier, cutting EBITDA from $6,000,000 to $4,200,000. With maintenance capital spending of $900,000, cash taxes of $500,000 and fixed charges of $2,300,000, the ratio fell to ($4,200,000 - $900,000 - $500,000) / $2,300,000 = $2,800,000 / $2,300,000, or about 1.22 times. Halden had breached by a margin so small that the finance team had not seen it coming until the quarter closed.

The remedy in this illustrative story was a $1,000,000 equity injection from the shareholders, which was applied to repay principal and reduce the denominator, alongside a revised covenant of 1.15 times for four quarters. The lasting change was that Halden began forecasting the covenant twelve months forward at every board meeting rather than reporting it after the fact.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Applying a textbook formula when the loan agreement contains its own definition, which is the only version that determines compliance.
  • Leaving scheduled principal repayments out of the denominator, which is the single most common reason a borrower's own calculation looks better than the bank's.
  • Reporting the ratio only after the quarter closes, leaving no time to act on a breach that was visible months earlier in the forecast.

Questions

People also ask.

What happens if the covenant is breached?

The lender usually has the right to demand repayment, but in practice most breaches are resolved through a waiver, a fee, a repricing or an equity injection.

Why subtract capital expenditure from earnings?

Because a business must keep replacing worn-out assets to stay in business, and that cash is not available to pay lenders even though it never appears in the profit calculation.

Is a higher ratio always better?

Generally yes from a credit perspective, though a very high ratio can suggest the company is underborrowed and could fund growth more cheaply with debt.

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · September 4, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.