Back to Glossary

Entry · Ratios

EBITDA To Fixed Charges

EBITDA to fixed charges is a coverage ratio that compares a company's earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA, a rough stand-in for operating cash flow) with the fixed payments it is committed to making each year. Those fixed charges normally include interest, lease and rent payments, and scheduled repayments of debt principal.

The higher the ratio, the more comfortably the business can meet its commitments out of trading profit.

From the Money Master HQ dictionary, founded by Shihan Sheriff (FCMA, VP of Finance at Nomod, CFO at Esanjo Ventures). How these definitions are written.

What it means

At its core this ratio answers a simple question that lenders and boards ask constantly: does the money the business generates from operations comfortably cover the payments it cannot avoid? EBITDA sits at the top of the fraction because it strips out accounting charges that do not consume cash in the current year, and the fixed charges sit underneath because they are the obligations that arrive whether trading is good or bad.

Fixed charges matter more than most managers expect. A company can cut marketing, freeze hiring or delay a project when revenue softens, but it cannot skip a lease instalment or a loan repayment without consequences.

That is why banks write this ratio into loan agreements as a covenant, and why a falling ratio is often the first hard evidence that a business is running out of headroom. The calculation itself is straightforward once you agree what counts as a fixed charge.

Most credit agreements include cash interest, operating lease or rent payments and scheduled principal repayments; some also add preference dividends or committed capital spending. Because the definition varies from one agreement to another, the covenant document, not textbook theory, decides which figures go in.

A ratio above roughly 2.0x usually reads as comfortable for a stable business, while anything close to 1.0x means every dollar of operating profit is already spoken for. Companies with volatile revenue are held to higher thresholds than utilities or subscription businesses, because their earnings can swing far more in a single year.

There are two common variants worth recognising. Some analysts use EBITDAR, which adds rent back into earnings and keeps rent in the denominator, so that businesses which lease their premises can be compared with those that own them.

Others prefer a cash-based version that replaces EBITDA with operating cash flow after working capital movements, on the sensible view that EBITDA can flatter a company that is tying up cash in stock and receivables.

In practice

Real-world examples.

1

Example

A family-owned bakery chain applies for a $3,000,000 expansion loan. The bank models EBITDA of $2,100,000 against fixed charges of $1,050,000, giving coverage of 2.0x, and sets a covenant requiring the ratio to stay above 1.5x for the life of the facility.

2

Example

A software company that rents three offices reports EBITDA of $6,000,000 and fixed charges of $5,000,000, a ratio of 1.2x. The finance director renegotiates one lease to a shorter term with lower payments, cutting fixed charges to $4,000,000 and lifting coverage to 1.5x.

3

Example

A private equity owner comparing two acquisition targets in the same sector finds identical operating margins but coverage of 3.1x at one and 1.4x at the other. The difference is entirely down to how much debt and how many leases each company already carries, which shapes the price the buyer is willing to pay.

Formula

Calculation

EBITDA to Fixed Charges = EBITDA / (Cash Interest + Lease and Rent Payments + Scheduled Principal Repayments) Take a regional logistics firm with EBITDA of $4,800,000 for the year. Its fixed charges are cash interest of $900,000, depot and vehicle lease payments of $600,000 and scheduled loan principal repayments of $500,000. Total fixed charges = $900,000 + $600,000 + $500,000 = $2,000,000. EBITDA to fixed charges = $4,800,000 / $2,000,000 = 2.4x. The firm generates 2.4 times the cash it needs for its committed payments. Put another way, EBITDA could fall by $2,800,000, or about 58%, before coverage dropped to 1.0x and the business had nothing left over.

Case study

Seen in the real world.

In this illustrative example, Harborline Cold Storage is a fictional refrigerated warehousing group that had grown by taking on leases rather than buying sites. In its strongest year it reported EBITDA of $9,000,000 against fixed charges of $3,600,000, comfortable coverage of 2.5x, and the board approved two more leased facilities on the strength of it.

Eighteen months later a large customer moved to a competitor and EBITDA fell to $5,400,000. Fixed charges had meanwhile risen to $4,500,000 as the new sites came on stream, so coverage dropped to 1.2x. The lender did not call the loan, but the covenant test at 1.25x was breached and Harborline had to accept a higher margin and a pause on further expansion.

The lesson the fictional management team drew was that fixed charges are set in advance and earnings are not. They rebuilt the plan around a rule that no new lease could be signed unless the forecast still showed coverage above 1.8x in a downside case where volumes fell by a fifth.

Watch out

Common mistakes.

  • Treating EBITDA as though it were cash in the bank. EBITDA ignores working capital movements, tax and capital spending, so a company can show healthy coverage while its bank balance shrinks.
  • Leaving scheduled principal repayments out of fixed charges. Interest alone understates the burden badly for any business with amortising debt, and flatters the ratio.
  • Comparing the ratio across companies without checking each definition. One firm may include rent and preference dividends while another counts only interest, which makes the headline numbers meaningless side by side.

Questions

People also ask.

How is this different from the interest coverage ratio?

Interest coverage looks only at interest payments, while EBITDA to fixed charges also captures leases and principal repayments, so it gives a fuller picture of committed outflows.

What ratio should a business aim for?

It depends on earnings stability, but many lenders are comfortable above 2.0x for a steady business and want more than that where revenue is cyclical or customer concentration is high.

Can the ratio be improved without earning more?

Yes, by refinancing to extend repayment schedules, converting leases to shorter or variable terms, or repaying debt early with surplus cash, though each option has its own cost.

Was this explanation helpful?

From the founder's library

Accounting Fundamentals: A Non-Finance Manager's Guide to Finance and Accounting, by Shihan Sheriff

Take it further with the book.

Build your financial confidence beyond this definition. Shihan's full-length guide, Accounting Fundamentals, takes the same plain-English approach and turns it into a complete, practical playbook for non-finance managers, business owners and students - with chapter-end quiz answers and presentation slides included.

US$2.24US$2.99

25% off with code MMHQ25, applied at checkout. Priced in USD - checkout may show the equivalent in your local currency.

View the book and save 25%
Last updated · October 8, 2026
Browse all terms →

Disclaimer

The information provided in this finance dictionary is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Money Master HQ makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. Use of this content is at your own risk.